Difference between revisions of "Barrel Calorimeter Commissioning"

From Hall D Ops Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__TOC__ Back to the Hall D commissioning page. ==Introduction== This document describes the commissioning process for the GlueX barrel calorimeter (B...")
 
(Data)
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
==Introduction==
 
==Introduction==
 
This document describes the commissioning process for the GlueX barrel calorimeter (BCAL).
 
This document describes the commissioning process for the GlueX barrel calorimeter (BCAL).
 +
 +
==Response to LED Monitoring System==
 +
The BCAL is equipped with an [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=2285 LED gain monitoring system], which will be used to check the functioning of each MPPC light sensor, as well as checking stability under various operating conditions. One LED is glued into every light guide, which guides the light to one MPPC.  The light from each LED is visible by the MPPC connected to the light guide, but also by the opposite MPPC on the other side of the BCAL module. Therefore there is some redundancy in the measured response to each LED light pulse. The response to the LED light signals is used to check the functioning of each MPPC by turning on one LED string and one HV channel at a time. Systematic studies have been completed to check the MPPC response under various conditions. However, the relative gains of each channel cannot be determined using this system, as the geometrical collection of light varies considerably between channels.
  
 
==Gain Normalization with Muons==
 
==Gain Normalization with Muons==
  
A trigger has been set up to collect events which are seen by both the barrel calorimeter (BCAL) and  
+
The gain of the BCAL FADC channels should be roughly matched initially because the voltage of each MPPC light sensor is set to
the CDC. This trigger runs at a rate of few Hz, with about 0.5Hz, yielding CDC data. In the
+
a fixed voltage above its breakdown voltage. Further refinement of the gain settings will be done using cosmic-ray muons
time between the middle of July and the middle of October, it should be possible to run these
+
(or other penetrating particles). 
 +
A trigger has been set up to identify particles traversing the magnet and BCAL at a constant position along the beam (z-direction).
 +
This trigger runs at a rate of about 0.5 Hz. Between the middle of July and the middle of October, it should be possible to run these
 
trigger on nights an weekends. A reasonable estimate is probably 50 hours per week of  
 
trigger on nights an weekends. A reasonable estimate is probably 50 hours per week of  
data collection, which yields about 90,000 events per week. This should yield sufficient data
+
data collection, which yields about 50k events per week, assuming 50% trigger efficiency. We estimate we need approximately 200k
to run initial passes of the calibration and alignment procedures, but a dedicated cosmic run
+
events to collect sufficient statistics for one iteration of gain matching with through-going muons and thus a few iterations of
should be planned after the November commissioning run. It is currently estimated that about
+
gain settings can be accomplished before the fall run. The energy loss of minimum-ionizing particles passing through individual channels
300,000 reasonable CDC events are needed for alignment. This is probably just compatible
+
depends on the channel layer and on the orientation of the modules relative to the passing tracks. We expect about 22 MeV of energy deposition
with the night and weekend running prior to the November run. The following activities are expected
+
in the innermost BCAL layer. Outer layers correspond to progressively larger detector areas as well as hardware summing of 2, 3 or 4 sensors.
to be done using cosmic events.
+
The gain adjustment will take these factors into account by comparing measured signals to energy depositions simulated with a cosmic-ray Monte Carlo.
  
# Study and minimize noise observed on the CDC as installed. This study does not require cosmic events, but work on making sure that the grounding and isolation of the CDC is fully optimized and set up according to specifications.
+
The following activities are expected to be done using cosmic events.
# Measure efficiency of hits on individual wires being used on tracks. This study can be carried out with about 50,000 events with good tracks in the CDC.
+
# Measure efficiency of channels along the track. This study can be carried out with about 50k events with good tracks in the BCAL.
# Final relative alignment between the CDC and the BCAL. An initial study can be carried out with on the order of 50,000 events with good tracks in the CDC
+
# Measure the response to thru muons. Compare to Monte Carlo to eliminate geometrical effects. Determine gain factors and/or adjust
# Optimization of the time and amplitude algorithms that will run on the FPGAs in the Flash 125 modules. This study requires around 10,000 events with good tracks in the CDC.
+
voltage settings to equalize the response to energy depositions in the BCAL.
# Final alignment of relative wire positions in the CDC. This requires ~300,000 good cosmic events.
+
  
 
==Gain Normalization with Michel Electrons==
 
==Gain Normalization with Michel Electrons==
  
==Commissioning and Alignment with Photon Beams==
+
There is a second class of cosmic-ray events which can provide a gain calibration for the BCAL modules. These are Michel electrons from muon decays. The energy spectrum peaks at the endpoint at 52 MeV. We plan to self-trigger the BCAL on cosmic-ray muons and then look for energy depositions in the same module at a later time. The exponential decay of muons will be a signature for the desired signal. The endpoint energy can be used as a calibration point for each BCAL channel. These events have the advantage that the response should be relatively independent of geometry or orientation. We will require approximately about 200k decays in the BCAL. The efficiency of the trigger and selection of muon decays is yet to be investigated. However, we can use muons stopping along the entire length of the BCAL, so they should be plentiful compared to the restrictive external cosmic-ray trigger used for calibration with through going muons.
Initial beam into Hall D is expected in November 2014. The data collected during this running will be utilized to continue commissioning and alignment of the CDC.
+
  
====Zero Magnetic Field====
+
=Commissioning with Photon Beam=
It is expected that running with either no magnetic field, or with very low magnetic field will be available for alignment studied of the detectors. At this point in time, it is not clear if the anticipated electromagnetic backgrounds during this running will allow operation of the CDC, or some fraction of the CDC. The following is predicated on being able to operate some fraction of the CDC during this running. From the perspective of the CDC commissioning, the primary purpose of this running will be for alignment, both of the CDC itself, and especially of the CDC with respect to the forward drift chambers (FDC). For the latter activity, the location of the scattering target should be upstream of its nominal position, perhaps near the up-stream end of the CDC.
+
Initial beam into Hall D is expected in November 2014. The data collected during this running will be utilized to continue commissioning the BCAL.
  
# Straight tracks originating from a well-defined target location in the CDC can be used to tune the locations of the wires found from cosmic events.
+
==Magnetic Field Studies==
# Straight tracks provide the optimal way to align the CDC with the FDC, both possible rotations of the detectors with respect to each other, but also as a check of the relative positions along the beam axis. The events necessary to calibrate the FDC alone will be sufficient to also carry out these alignment studies between the two chamber systems.
+
  
====Non-zero Magnetic Field====
+
# Verify response of detector is insensitive to the magnetic field
In Fall of 2014, the CDC will be operated in magnetic field for the first time. Two big changes will occur relative to running in zero magnetic field, both of which have been carefully simulated using the GARFIELD program. First, the trajectories of the ionization electrons produced along the primary track will follow a curved path as they drift to the wire at the center of the straw tube. Thus, for a given radius of the primary track, the signal will take longer to reach the CDC, and a different time-to-distance look-up table will need to be used. Second, the magnetic field is not uniform along the length of the CDC, and these variations will affect the time-to-distance relations as well. Corrections for this effect based on the known magnetic field and GARFIELD studies have been built into the reconstruction code, but these also need to be checked.  
+
# Measure rates of hits and particles in the BCAL with and without magnetic field.
  
# Do all channels function in magnetic field. This can be determined from the first hour of beam.  
+
== Data ==
# Electromagnetic background levels in the CDC. This involves looking at raw hits in the detector as a function of layer in the CDC. This can happen with the first day of beam.
+
# Preliminaries
# Basic low-level performance studies of the CDC in magnetic field. For reconstructed tracks, drift-time distributions, amplitude distributions, occupancy of the straws, occupancy of the detector. This will require at least one day worth of data.
+
## Check that pedestals are all at their nominal settings, else adjust them.
# Check and optimize the CDC alignment with tracks in magnetic field. Particularly those tracks that are seen by other detectors.
+
## Evaluate optimum values of Nsa and Nsb based on existing data. Conservative values are Nsa= and Nsb=55.
# Calibrate the CDC by optimizing the choice of look-up-table for the data. This will be performed by reconstructing tracks in the CDC and optimizing on the tracking chi-square between the hit positions and the reconstructed track position. This will require several days of data.
+
## Make sure there is a comparable (unbiased) data set triggered on the FCAL that can be used as a reference for BCAL with no trigger thresholds.
# Calibrate the magnetic-field dependent effects in the chamber, this will require at least a week of data to assess.
+
## Set the data thresholds to the lowest robust setting possible, currently at 110.
 +
# Need Working BCAL trigger (needs to be setup by Sasha/Serguei)
 +
## Fix global threshold, set Nsa_trigger= and Nsb_trigger=
 +
## Preliminary scan changing thresholds during one run
 +
##* Record BCAL scalers and trigger rate as Flash threshold is changed.
 +
##* Pick a set of Flash thresholds for run scan (next), 110, 120, 130, 140, 150
 +
##* Pick a set of global thresholds for run scan (next), e.g. 10*60*110=66000 (assuming 10 cells x 60 samples x 110 threshold/sample).
 +
# BCAL trigger studies
 +
## Scan across Flash threshold. Record trigger rate. Take data at each threshold to analyze signal efficiency for that threshold. Use pi0 peak if it is identified. Otherwise use energy loss of negative hadrons.
 +
## Scan across global threshold. Record trigger rate. Take data at each threshold to analyze signal efficiency for that threshold. Use pi0 peak if it is identified. Otherwise use energy loss of negative hadrons.
 +
# Voltage bias scan. To set voltages see [[Barrel Calorimeter Expert]]
 +
## Nominal voltage setting at the nominal Vover=1.2 V (upstream=downstream). (200k events.Take data with FCAL trigger for low bias and BCAL for high statistics).
 +
## Take data at Vover =1.4 V (upstream), Vover=1.4 V (downstream). 200k events
 +
## Take data at Vover=0.9 V (upstream), Vover=0.9 V (downstream). 200k events
 +
## Take data at Vover =1.4 V (upstream), Vover=0.9 V (downstream). 200k events
 +
## Take data at Vover =0.9 V (upstream), Vover=1.4 V (downstream). 200k events
 +
## Take data at Vover=1.5 V (upstream), Vover=1.5 V (downstream). 200k events
 +
# Temperature scan. To set voltages see [[Barrel Calorimeter Expert]]
 +
## Take data at 12 and 24 deg C. (>2 hours each to accumulate statistics and also study stability. Take data with BCAL trigger)
 +
## Note that this requires changing the temperature of the chiller, which requires an access. So three accesses are required for this scan.
  
 
==Calibration and Detector Performance during Normal Running==
 
==Calibration and Detector Performance during Normal Running==
During normal experimental running, the main calibration effort will be making sure that the correct time-to-distance look-up-table is used for reconstruction. Verification of the correct choice can be made by looking at the the tracking chi-square between the hit positions and the reconstructed track positions. This can be run on normal data, possibly with some preselection by the level-3 software trigger towards events with long tracks in the CDC. The external factors that can affect the choice of the look-up-table are the density of the gas in the CDC, the exact high-voltage setting for the wires, and the magnetic field in the CDC. The gas density is probably the most dynamic. It depends on the atmospheric pressure in the Hall and the temperature of the chamber gas. Both of these are monitored variables that will be placed in the data stream at regular intervals with the period being measured in minutes. It is expected that the reconstruction software will ultimately follow these variables and mak dynamic corrections during processing. The tracking chi-square will be used as a variable to both tune this procedure, and monitor the quality of the reconstruction.
+
 
 +
# Select an event sample of neutrals in the BCAL
 +
# Find a clean sample of pi0 events that can be used for gain matching
 +
# Select a sample of pi0 events with one photon in the FCAL and one in the BCAL
 +
# If FCAL has already been gain matched, assume their calibration is correct and adjust gains of BCAL elements
 +
# After initial calibrations have been completed, search for a sample of eta events and repeat.
 +
<hr>
  
 
Back to the [[Hall D Commissioning|Hall D commissioning]] page.
 
Back to the [[Hall D Commissioning|Hall D commissioning]] page.

Latest revision as of 08:19, 3 December 2014

Back to the Hall D commissioning page.

Introduction

This document describes the commissioning process for the GlueX barrel calorimeter (BCAL).

Response to LED Monitoring System

The BCAL is equipped with an LED gain monitoring system, which will be used to check the functioning of each MPPC light sensor, as well as checking stability under various operating conditions. One LED is glued into every light guide, which guides the light to one MPPC. The light from each LED is visible by the MPPC connected to the light guide, but also by the opposite MPPC on the other side of the BCAL module. Therefore there is some redundancy in the measured response to each LED light pulse. The response to the LED light signals is used to check the functioning of each MPPC by turning on one LED string and one HV channel at a time. Systematic studies have been completed to check the MPPC response under various conditions. However, the relative gains of each channel cannot be determined using this system, as the geometrical collection of light varies considerably between channels.

Gain Normalization with Muons

The gain of the BCAL FADC channels should be roughly matched initially because the voltage of each MPPC light sensor is set to a fixed voltage above its breakdown voltage. Further refinement of the gain settings will be done using cosmic-ray muons (or other penetrating particles). A trigger has been set up to identify particles traversing the magnet and BCAL at a constant position along the beam (z-direction). This trigger runs at a rate of about 0.5 Hz. Between the middle of July and the middle of October, it should be possible to run these trigger on nights an weekends. A reasonable estimate is probably 50 hours per week of data collection, which yields about 50k events per week, assuming 50% trigger efficiency. We estimate we need approximately 200k events to collect sufficient statistics for one iteration of gain matching with through-going muons and thus a few iterations of gain settings can be accomplished before the fall run. The energy loss of minimum-ionizing particles passing through individual channels depends on the channel layer and on the orientation of the modules relative to the passing tracks. We expect about 22 MeV of energy deposition in the innermost BCAL layer. Outer layers correspond to progressively larger detector areas as well as hardware summing of 2, 3 or 4 sensors. The gain adjustment will take these factors into account by comparing measured signals to energy depositions simulated with a cosmic-ray Monte Carlo.

The following activities are expected to be done using cosmic events.

  1. Measure efficiency of channels along the track. This study can be carried out with about 50k events with good tracks in the BCAL.
  2. Measure the response to thru muons. Compare to Monte Carlo to eliminate geometrical effects. Determine gain factors and/or adjust

voltage settings to equalize the response to energy depositions in the BCAL.

Gain Normalization with Michel Electrons

There is a second class of cosmic-ray events which can provide a gain calibration for the BCAL modules. These are Michel electrons from muon decays. The energy spectrum peaks at the endpoint at 52 MeV. We plan to self-trigger the BCAL on cosmic-ray muons and then look for energy depositions in the same module at a later time. The exponential decay of muons will be a signature for the desired signal. The endpoint energy can be used as a calibration point for each BCAL channel. These events have the advantage that the response should be relatively independent of geometry or orientation. We will require approximately about 200k decays in the BCAL. The efficiency of the trigger and selection of muon decays is yet to be investigated. However, we can use muons stopping along the entire length of the BCAL, so they should be plentiful compared to the restrictive external cosmic-ray trigger used for calibration with through going muons.

Commissioning with Photon Beam

Initial beam into Hall D is expected in November 2014. The data collected during this running will be utilized to continue commissioning the BCAL.

Magnetic Field Studies

  1. Verify response of detector is insensitive to the magnetic field
  2. Measure rates of hits and particles in the BCAL with and without magnetic field.

Data

  1. Preliminaries
    1. Check that pedestals are all at their nominal settings, else adjust them.
    2. Evaluate optimum values of Nsa and Nsb based on existing data. Conservative values are Nsa= and Nsb=55.
    3. Make sure there is a comparable (unbiased) data set triggered on the FCAL that can be used as a reference for BCAL with no trigger thresholds.
    4. Set the data thresholds to the lowest robust setting possible, currently at 110.
  2. Need Working BCAL trigger (needs to be setup by Sasha/Serguei)
    1. Fix global threshold, set Nsa_trigger= and Nsb_trigger=
    2. Preliminary scan changing thresholds during one run
      • Record BCAL scalers and trigger rate as Flash threshold is changed.
      • Pick a set of Flash thresholds for run scan (next), 110, 120, 130, 140, 150
      • Pick a set of global thresholds for run scan (next), e.g. 10*60*110=66000 (assuming 10 cells x 60 samples x 110 threshold/sample).
  3. BCAL trigger studies
    1. Scan across Flash threshold. Record trigger rate. Take data at each threshold to analyze signal efficiency for that threshold. Use pi0 peak if it is identified. Otherwise use energy loss of negative hadrons.
    2. Scan across global threshold. Record trigger rate. Take data at each threshold to analyze signal efficiency for that threshold. Use pi0 peak if it is identified. Otherwise use energy loss of negative hadrons.
  4. Voltage bias scan. To set voltages see Barrel Calorimeter Expert
    1. Nominal voltage setting at the nominal Vover=1.2 V (upstream=downstream). (200k events.Take data with FCAL trigger for low bias and BCAL for high statistics).
    2. Take data at Vover =1.4 V (upstream), Vover=1.4 V (downstream). 200k events
    3. Take data at Vover=0.9 V (upstream), Vover=0.9 V (downstream). 200k events
    4. Take data at Vover =1.4 V (upstream), Vover=0.9 V (downstream). 200k events
    5. Take data at Vover =0.9 V (upstream), Vover=1.4 V (downstream). 200k events
    6. Take data at Vover=1.5 V (upstream), Vover=1.5 V (downstream). 200k events
  5. Temperature scan. To set voltages see Barrel Calorimeter Expert
    1. Take data at 12 and 24 deg C. (>2 hours each to accumulate statistics and also study stability. Take data with BCAL trigger)
    2. Note that this requires changing the temperature of the chiller, which requires an access. So three accesses are required for this scan.

Calibration and Detector Performance during Normal Running

  1. Select an event sample of neutrals in the BCAL
  2. Find a clean sample of pi0 events that can be used for gain matching
  3. Select a sample of pi0 events with one photon in the FCAL and one in the BCAL
  4. If FCAL has already been gain matched, assume their calibration is correct and adjust gains of BCAL elements
  5. After initial calibrations have been completed, search for a sample of eta events and repeat.

Back to the Hall D commissioning page.