MantisBT - Hall D Offline | |||||
| View Issue Details | |||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
| 0000381 | Hall D Offline | General | public | 2013-09-13 13:50 | 2013-09-13 13:50 |
| Reporter | wilevine | ||||
| Assigned To | |||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||
| Summary | 0000381: mcsmear BCAL: verify BCAL_mevPerPE value | ||||
| Description | Elton thinks the value of BCAL_mevPerPE is off by a factor of 2: "We looked at the code in smear_bcal.cc and find the following statement at line 398: BCAL_mevPerPE = 1.0/( BCAL_PHOTONSPERSIDEPERMEV_INFIBER * BCAL_DEVICEPDE * BCAL_SAMPLING_FRACT ); = 1/(75x 0.21 x 0.095) = 0.67 [As an side, I think this number lacks a factor of 2 reduction in p.e. due to light guide collection, which would bring the factor up to 1.3 MeV/p.e. Is this factor missing?]" | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | |||||
| Additional Information | |||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Relationships | |||||
| Attached Files | |||||
| Issue History | |||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | ||
| 2013-09-13 13:50 | wilevine | New Issue | |||
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |