Dear Curtis,

    well, it is clear that the level of detail and progress
should be higher for Hall D given the state where they are in
(that is not true for Hall A as there we also integrated the
high-rate SBS/GEM tracking in the review scope). There will be
a few items I will bring up in the preparations we will ask
to explicitly make slides for, at the moment as follows
(tentative only):

    1. overview of software to be used and status
        e.g. GEANT-4 for simulation, ...
    2. overview of databases used and how
        e.g. geometry, calibration, ...
    3. overview of computing requirements +
        spreadsheets showing all bottoms-up calculations
        and assumed running days for next 2-3 years
        level of detail: core-seconds per event for
        a specific (named) core, e.g. Haswell 2.7 GHz
    4. overview of computing model showing
        flow of data from detector to Phys Rev Letter
        (simulation, calibration, reconstruction, ...)
        including how physicists will work, what software
        tools / applications they will use

    Let's see where we come up with all Halls together on
agenda, and see if we can get you more plenary and less breakout
time, your wish is understood and noted.

                Best regards,    Rolf