Difference between revisions of "Run Coordinator report: Summer 2020 w8"
From GlueXWiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
RC summary, 09/17/2020 - 09/21/2020, Igal Jaegle | RC summary, 09/17/2020 - 09/21/2020, Igal Jaegle | ||
− | Dung the last 6 days of the | + | Dung the last 6 days of the summer run, the beam was stable and we took production data, and carried out two tests: PS and CCAL. The downtime was 10.4hrs |
− | *Physics production: total 18.06B - perp 8.18B para 7.86B amo 2.02B | + | * Physics production: total 18.06B - perp 8.18B para 7.86B amo 2.02B |
− | *PS study for flux normalization | + | * PS study for flux normalization |
− | *CCAL test with 2nA beam to test new | + | * CCAL test with 2nA beam to test new active basis |
The most notable issues were | The most notable issues were | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* It was difficult to nudge the coherent peak probably because the diamond degraded | * It was difficult to nudge the coherent peak probably because the diamond degraded | ||
* Few FCAL bases have to be replaced | * Few FCAL bases have to be replaced | ||
+ | * Minor DAQ problem |
Revision as of 09:10, 6 October 2020
RC summary, 09/17/2020 - 09/21/2020, Igal Jaegle
Dung the last 6 days of the summer run, the beam was stable and we took production data, and carried out two tests: PS and CCAL. The downtime was 10.4hrs
- Physics production: total 18.06B - perp 8.18B para 7.86B amo 2.02B
- PS study for flux normalization
- CCAL test with 2nA beam to test new active basis
The most notable issues were
- Goniometer controler board has to be replaced
- It was difficult to nudge the coherent peak probably because the diamond degraded
- Few FCAL bases have to be replaced
- Minor DAQ problem