Difference between revisions of "Aug 20 2024 PrimEx-eta (informal) Calibration & Analysis Meeting"
From GlueXWiki
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
# Analysis | # Analysis | ||
# Two analysis strategy: | # Two analysis strategy: | ||
− | #** What is common? | + | #* What should be compared? |
− | #** How to treat differences? | + | #*** N_{yield}(E_\gamma,\theta) or/and |
+ | #*** d\sigma\d\Omega(E_\gamma,\theta) or/and | ||
+ | #*** \Gamma(\eta \to \gamma\gamma) | ||
+ | #* What is common? | ||
+ | #** Same inputs: | ||
+ | #*** Data (full & empty) & simulation (signal & background) files | ||
+ | #*** Integrated luminosity and energy bin | ||
+ | #*** Branching ratios | ||
+ | #*** Cool gas contribution | ||
+ | #* How to treat differences? | ||
+ | #* Below 1\sigma | ||
+ | #* Between 1\sigma and 2\sigma | ||
+ | #* Above 2\sigma | ||
# Data/Simu: | # Data/Simu: | ||
#* What is the \eta polar angle resolution? -> data/simu comparison is good? | #* What is the \eta polar angle resolution? -> data/simu comparison is good? |
Latest revision as of 09:56, 20 August 2024
Time and Place
- Time: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 at 10:00 am EDT.
- Room: Online
Meeting Connections
Join ZoomGov Meeting https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1603338968?pwd=RE82K09ocHlMUVdVZXAwRTh1ZmF6dz09
Meeting ID: 160 333 8968 Passcode: 237672 One tap mobile +16692545252,,1603338968# US (San Jose) +16468287666,,1603338968# US (New York)
Dial by your location
+1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose) +1 646 828 7666 US (New York) +1 551 285 1373 US +1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose) 833 568 8864 US Toll-free
Meeting ID: 160 333 8968 Find your local number: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/u/abf7wcfSu1
Join by SIP 1603338968@sip.zoomgov.com
Join by H.323 161.199.138.10 (US West) 161.199.136.10 (US East) Meeting ID: 160 333 8968 Passcode: 237672
Agenda
- Announcements
- List of good runs
- Run Validation phase I -- https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/RunPeriod-2019-01_Validation
- Run Validation phase II -- https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/RunPeriod-2021-08_Validation
- Run Validation phase III -- https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/RunPeriod-2022-08_Validation
- Analysis
- Two analysis strategy:
- What should be compared?
- N_{yield}(E_\gamma,\theta) or/and
- d\sigma\d\Omega(E_\gamma,\theta) or/and
- \Gamma(\eta \to \gamma\gamma)
- What is common?
- Same inputs:
- Data (full & empty) & simulation (signal & background) files
- Integrated luminosity and energy bin
- Branching ratios
- Cool gas contribution
- Same inputs:
- How to treat differences?
- Below 1\sigma
- Between 1\sigma and 2\sigma
- Above 2\sigma
- What should be compared?
- Data/Simu:
- What is the \eta polar angle resolution? -> data/simu comparison is good?
- Calibration is done
- Analysis Updates:
- Viviana
- Drew
- ig
- BGGEN check