Difference between revisions of "Mattione Update 10312011"
From GlueXWiki
(→BCAL Proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits with BCAL Time Smear Disabled) |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* γ BCAL σ<sub>t</sub> vs. dE (GeV): | * γ BCAL σ<sub>t</sub> vs. dE (GeV): | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta12Degrees.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta12Degrees.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta16Degrees.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta16Degrees.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta20Degrees.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta20Degrees.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta50Degrees.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta50Degrees.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta90Degrees.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolution_Theta90Degrees.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|} | |} | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* Don't trust fits at low-θ, so linearly-interpolate between 12 and 16 degrees. | * Don't trust fits at low-θ, so linearly-interpolate between 12 and 16 degrees. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio_Fits1.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio_Fits1.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio_Fits2.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio_Fits2.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio_Fits3.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio_Fits3.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|} | |} | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
*** Last week, the fit was extrapolated from high-θ over the low-θ range. | *** Last week, the fit was extrapolated from high-θ over the low-θ range. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits1.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits1.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits2.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits2.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits3.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits3.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits4.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits4.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits5.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaT_Fits5.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|} | |} | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
** NOTE: For the third and forth dE bins, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function. | ** NOTE: For the third and forth dE bins, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits1.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits1.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits2.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits2.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits3.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits3.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits4.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits4.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits5.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits5.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|} | |} | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
*** Last week, the π- fit was used, and was extrapolated from high-θ over the low-θ range. | *** Last week, the π- fit was used, and was extrapolated from high-θ over the low-θ range. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits1.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits1.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits2.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits2.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits3.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits3.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits4.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits4.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits5.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaT_Fits5.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|} | |} | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
** NOTE: For the second dE bin, for θ <= 27.0, the values were linearly interpolated between the points. For θ > 27.0, the time resolution was set to zero. | ** NOTE: For the second dE bin, for θ <= 27.0, the values were linearly interpolated between the points. For θ > 27.0, the time resolution was set to zero. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits1.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits1.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits2.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits2.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits3.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits3.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits4.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits4.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits5.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear_Fits5.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|} | |} | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
* BCAL proton σ<sub>t</sub> vs. θ in dE bins, 334 vs 1234 Segmentation: | * BCAL proton σ<sub>t</sub> vs. θ in dE bins, 334 vs 1234 Segmentation: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin1.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin1.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin2.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin2.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin3.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin3.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin4.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin4.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
− | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin5.gif|thumb|left| | + | | [[Image:Mattione_Update_10312011_BCALProtonSigmaTCompare_Bin5.gif|thumb|left|300px]] |
|} | |} | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> |
Revision as of 13:22, 2 November 2011
Contents
- 1 Procedure
- 2 David's BCAL Photon Time Resolution Studies
- 3 Time Resolution Segmentation Ratio
- 4 Summary of BCAL π- & proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits
- 5 BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits
- 6 BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits with BCAL Time Smear Disabled
- 7 BCAL Proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits
- 8 BCAL Proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits with BCAL Time Smear Disabled
- 9 BCAL Proton BCAL σt 334 vs 1234 Segmentation
- 10 π(1600) -> b1pi Events, π+ BCAL Δβ vs p
Procedure
- Reconstruct π(1600) -> b1π events with t-slope = 2.0 (was 5.0 for X(2000)) using both the 334 and 1234 segmentations
- Plot Δβ vs p for π+ candidates to see proton, π+ separation.
1234 Segmentation BCAL Time-Smear Details
- The 1234 segmentation is not available in the HDGEANT simulation, so its BCAL shower time was smeared manually during reconstruction
- The BCAL hit-time smear was disabled in mc_smear
- The shower time was smeared by: σsmear = sqrt(σ2t_334 - σ2t_334_NoSmear) * σt_1234 / σt_334
- These time uncertainties were studied as a function of dE and θ
- The σt_1234 / σt_334 ratio was obtained from fitting the results of David Lawrence's studies of photons
- The σ2t_334 and σ2t_334_NoSmear variances were determined separately for protons and pions, by comparing the reconstructed shower times to their true values.
Improvements from last week's study
- Looking at π(1600) -> b1π events with t-slope = 2.0 instead of π(2000) -> b1π events with t-slope = 5.0: Higher proton momentum in BCAL for studying separation
- The σt_334_NoSmear resolution is no longer assumed to be zero: it is non-negligible in the region of the FDC support structure at for large energy deposits (determined separately for protons and pions)
- The σt_334 resolution is determined separately for protons and pions (was using the pion resolution for both previously)
- Better fit to photon σt_1234 / σt_334 distributions due to extra data point at 50 degrees
- Low-θ, low-dE time resolutions better-simulated: instead of extrapolating fit, performing linear-interpolation between data-points.
Issues
- The photon σt_1234 / σt_334 is assumed to be applicable to protons and pions
David's BCAL Photon Time Resolution Studies
- γ BCAL σt vs. dE (GeV):
Time Resolution Segmentation Ratio
- γ BCAL σt_1234 / σt_334 vs. dE (GeV):
- Fits to γ BCAL σt_1234 / σt_334 vs. θ in dE bins:
- Don't trust fits at low-θ, so linearly-interpolate between 12 and 16 degrees.
Summary of BCAL π- & proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits
- When the BCAL time-smear is enabled, the π- & proton time resolutions are similar.
- When the BCAL time-smear is enabled, the π- & proton time resolutions are similar, except at high shower energies.
BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits
- BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits vs. θ in dE bins:
- NOTE: For the first dE bin, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
- Last week, the fit was extrapolated from high-θ over the low-θ range.
- NOTE: For the first dE bin, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits with BCAL Time Smear Disabled
- BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits with BCAL Time Smear Disabled vs. θ in dE bins:
- NOTE: These resolutions are negligible except at high dE.
- NOTE: The bad fit results were ignored.
- NOTE: For the first two dE bins, the time smear was set to zero.
- NOTE: For the third and forth dE bins, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
BCAL Proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits
- BCAL proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits vs. θ in dE bins:
- NOTE: For the first dE bin, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
- Last week, the π- fit was used, and was extrapolated from high-θ over the low-θ range.
- NOTE: For the first dE bin, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
BCAL Proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits with BCAL Time Smear Disabled
- BCAL proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits vs. θ in dE bins:
- NOTE: These resolutions are negligible except at high dE.
- NOTE: The bad fit results were ignored.
- NOTE: For the first dE bin, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
- NOTE: For the second dE bin, for θ <= 27.0, the values were linearly interpolated between the points. For θ > 27.0, the time resolution was set to zero.
BCAL Proton BCAL σt 334 vs 1234 Segmentation
- BCAL proton σt vs. θ in dE bins, 334 vs 1234 Segmentation:
π(1600) -> b1pi Events, π+ BCAL Δβ vs p
Δβ = βp - βt = p/sqrt(p*p + m*m) - path/(c*TOF)
- π(1600) -> b1pi Events, π+ BCAL Δβ vs p:
- NOTE: Resolution improvement is worse than last week due to a bug in the previous iteration.
- π(1600) -> b1pi Events, π+ Candidates, BCAL Δβ vs p