Difference between revisions of "USM SiPM Testing Readiness Review Checklist"
From GlueXWiki
(→Final Acceptance Test Plan, comprised of) |
(→Review Check List ***DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT***) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Review Check List ***DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT*** == | == Review Check List ***DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT*** == | ||
− | The goal of the | + | The goal of the SiPM Testing Readiness Review is to assess whether USM is ready to begin production testing of SiPM sensors for the Hall D barrel calorimeter. Specifically the following questions need to be examined: |
# Environment | # Environment | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
##* Are the MSDS information sheets available for all products used during production? | ##* Are the MSDS information sheets available for all products used during production? | ||
##* What support do you get from university EH&S services? | ##* What support do you get from university EH&S services? | ||
− | ##* Are there any materials (e.g cleaning agents/etc) that are of particular hazard during | + | ##* Are there any materials (e.g cleaning agents/etc) that are of particular hazard during testing |
# Procedures: | # Procedures: | ||
− | ## Are all procedures for | + | ## Are all procedures for receipt of SiPMs documented? |
− | ## Are all procedures for | + | ## Are all procedures for receipt inspection documented? |
− | ## Guidance should be given for each of the steps in the | + | ## Are all procedures for handling SiPMs documented? |
+ | ## Are all procedures for the microscope inspection testing documented? | ||
+ | ## Are all procedures for the PDE and Pulse shape measurements documented? | ||
+ | ## Are all procedures for the MPPC Dark Box testing documented? | ||
+ | ## Guidance should be given for each of the steps in the testing process for ease of estimating completion times. | ||
# Training: | # Training: | ||
## What are the training procedures for first-time workers in each of the areas where they will work? | ## What are the training procedures for first-time workers in each of the areas where they will work? | ||
## How is this documented? | ## How is this documented? | ||
# Acceptance Testing | # Acceptance Testing | ||
− | ## | + | ## MPPC Microscope Inspection |
##* Are the testing procedures clearly defined? | ##* Are the testing procedures clearly defined? | ||
− | ##* | + | ##* Are the criteria for accepting MPPCs clearly specified? |
− | ##* How is the | + | ##* How is the data from this test recorded? |
− | ## | + | ## MPPC PDE and Pulse Shape Measurement |
− | ##* How are the | + | ##* How are the units selected for this test? |
− | ##* | + | ##* What is the cross talk between cells in the PDE test? |
− | ##* | + | ##* How is the light source for the PDE measurements calibrated? |
− | ## | + | ##* Is the procedure for testing clearly defined? |
− | ##* How are | + | ##* How are test data recorded? |
− | ##* | + | ##* Are the criteria for accepting MPPCs clearly specified? |
− | ##* How are the | + | ## MPPC Dark Box Test |
− | ##* How | + | ##* How are the MPPCs selected for this test? |
− | ##* How | + | ##* How are the reference MPPCs selected? |
− | ##* | + | ##* How is the environment (temp and humidity) controlled and recorded? |
− | ## | + | ##* Under which conditions do the tests need to be repeated? |
− | ##* | + | ##* Are the criteria for accepting MPPCs clearly defined? |
− | ## | + | ##* How is the data analyzed to determine the quantities of interest? |
− | ##* | + | ## Storing MPPCs |
− | ##* What | + | ##* Where and how are the MPPCs stored? |
+ | ##* What are the procedures for maintaining control of all units (both tested and untested)? | ||
# Recovery Procedures | # Recovery Procedures | ||
− | ## What are the procedures for reporting an anomally in measurements during | + | ## What are the procedures for reporting an anomally in measurements during testing? |
− | ## What are the procedures for rectifying any problems encountered during | + | ## What are the procedures for rectifying any problems encountered during testing? Is this documented? |
# Acceptance Testing of completed module | # Acceptance Testing of completed module | ||
## Are all the items listed in Section 4.2 of the SOW addressed in the Quality Assurance and Test Plan Document? | ## Are all the items listed in Section 4.2 of the SOW addressed in the Quality Assurance and Test Plan Document? | ||
− | ## Are any of the | + | ## Are any of the sensors going to be retested periodically to check stability of the setup? |
# Tracking | # Tracking | ||
− | + | ## What information is recorded for each MPPC? | |
− | ## What information is recorded for | + | ## What information is recorded for the sample of MPPCs tested for PDE and pulse shape? |
− | ## What information is recorded for the | + | ## What information is provided with each shipment? |
− | ## What information is | + | |
− | + | ||
# Schedule | # Schedule | ||
## How is the schedule tracked? | ## How is the schedule tracked? | ||
− | ## Note: Time for completion of | + | ## Note: Time for completion of the tests at each station should be estimated based on the information to date. Re-evaluation of the schedule should be done with additional production experience. |
# Reporting | # Reporting | ||
+ | ## Is reporting chain within USM clear? | ||
## Is the reporting chain to the project clear? | ## Is the reporting chain to the project clear? | ||
== Contract Requirements == | == Contract Requirements == | ||
− | # Final Construction Plan | + | # Final Construction Quality Assurance Plan |
− | # Final | + | # Final Acceptance Test Plan. |
== Requirements and Quality Assurance: Section 3 and 4 of the Statement of Work == | == Requirements and Quality Assurance: Section 3 and 4 of the Statement of Work == | ||
The vendor shall prepare a Quality Assurance and Acceptance Test Plan for approval by JLab at the Readiness Review. The following items must be included: | The vendor shall prepare a Quality Assurance and Acceptance Test Plan for approval by JLab at the Readiness Review. The following items must be included: | ||
− | === QA and Acceptance Test Plan (Section 4.2 | + | === QA and Acceptance Test Plan (Section 4.2) === |
==A Component Inspection Plan, comprised of== | ==A Component Inspection Plan, comprised of== | ||
Line 85: | Line 89: | ||
===Tracking === | ===Tracking === | ||
− | The vendor must keep a record | + | The vendor must keep a record of all test data related to each SiPM for later use in instrumenting the Bcal modules. |
Latest revision as of 18:44, 29 November 2011
USM SiPM Testing Readiness Review Checklist ***DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT***
Contents
- 1 Review Check List ***DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT***
- 2 Contract Requirements
- 3 Requirements and Quality Assurance: Section 3 and 4 of the Statement of Work
- 4 A Component Inspection Plan, comprised of
- 5 A Process Quality Plan, comprised of
- 6 Final Acceptance Test Plan, based on the SiPM specification D00000-01-07-S004 Rev-A, comprised of
Review Check List ***DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT***
The goal of the SiPM Testing Readiness Review is to assess whether USM is ready to begin production testing of SiPM sensors for the Hall D barrel calorimeter. Specifically the following questions need to be examined:
- Environment
- General
- Are the MSDS information sheets available for all products used during production?
- What support do you get from university EH&S services?
- Are there any materials (e.g cleaning agents/etc) that are of particular hazard during testing
- General
- Procedures:
- Are all procedures for receipt of SiPMs documented?
- Are all procedures for receipt inspection documented?
- Are all procedures for handling SiPMs documented?
- Are all procedures for the microscope inspection testing documented?
- Are all procedures for the PDE and Pulse shape measurements documented?
- Are all procedures for the MPPC Dark Box testing documented?
- Guidance should be given for each of the steps in the testing process for ease of estimating completion times.
- Training:
- What are the training procedures for first-time workers in each of the areas where they will work?
- How is this documented?
- Acceptance Testing
- MPPC Microscope Inspection
- Are the testing procedures clearly defined?
- Are the criteria for accepting MPPCs clearly specified?
- How is the data from this test recorded?
- MPPC PDE and Pulse Shape Measurement
- How are the units selected for this test?
- What is the cross talk between cells in the PDE test?
- How is the light source for the PDE measurements calibrated?
- Is the procedure for testing clearly defined?
- How are test data recorded?
- Are the criteria for accepting MPPCs clearly specified?
- MPPC Dark Box Test
- How are the MPPCs selected for this test?
- How are the reference MPPCs selected?
- How is the environment (temp and humidity) controlled and recorded?
- Under which conditions do the tests need to be repeated?
- Are the criteria for accepting MPPCs clearly defined?
- How is the data analyzed to determine the quantities of interest?
- Storing MPPCs
- Where and how are the MPPCs stored?
- What are the procedures for maintaining control of all units (both tested and untested)?
- MPPC Microscope Inspection
- Recovery Procedures
- What are the procedures for reporting an anomally in measurements during testing?
- What are the procedures for rectifying any problems encountered during testing? Is this documented?
- Acceptance Testing of completed module
- Are all the items listed in Section 4.2 of the SOW addressed in the Quality Assurance and Test Plan Document?
- Are any of the sensors going to be retested periodically to check stability of the setup?
- Tracking
- What information is recorded for each MPPC?
- What information is recorded for the sample of MPPCs tested for PDE and pulse shape?
- What information is provided with each shipment?
- Schedule
- How is the schedule tracked?
- Note: Time for completion of the tests at each station should be estimated based on the information to date. Re-evaluation of the schedule should be done with additional production experience.
- Reporting
- Is reporting chain within USM clear?
- Is the reporting chain to the project clear?
Contract Requirements
- Final Construction Quality Assurance Plan
- Final Acceptance Test Plan.
Requirements and Quality Assurance: Section 3 and 4 of the Statement of Work
The vendor shall prepare a Quality Assurance and Acceptance Test Plan for approval by JLab at the Readiness Review. The following items must be included:
QA and Acceptance Test Plan (Section 4.2)
A Component Inspection Plan, comprised of
- Inspection of all materials received from the vendor’s suppliers and subcontractors and the recording of this information.
- Obtaining and recording of all material certifications and analyses.
- The calibration and identification of standards and instrumentation used for testing; the intervals between calibrations are also to be defined.
- Establishment of inspection points for the incoming components, which will measure critical parameters.
- The recording of all inspection data in such a manner so that the history of a component can be readily traced.
- The submittal to JLab of all data related to the above.
A Process Quality Plan, comprised of
- Step-by-step process documents, with instructions and prints pertaining to each assembly and/or manufacturing step.
- Safety information for the job operator, including material data safety sheets
- A method of reporting any mechanical defects found during assembly of components.
- A mechanism for recording all job operator work sessions.
- The submittal to JLab of all data related to the above.
Final Acceptance Test Plan, based on the SiPM specification D00000-01-07-S004 Rev-A, comprised of
- Dark current and response to a standard light source at 5 and 20 degrees C.
- Uniformity of response across all 16 cells of each array.
- Verification and recording of operating parameters for each SiPM.
Tracking
The vendor must keep a record of all test data related to each SiPM for later use in instrumenting the Bcal modules.