Difference between revisions of "BCal Beam Test Plots, April 4, 2007"
From GlueXWiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | This page describes a study of the timing resolution for the BCAL beam test using run 2440. There was an issue with the data in the DST trees in which it appears the reference time subtracted from the BCAL TDC values was different than that used for the veto TDC values. The evidence for this is that the veto/tagger timing difference(obtained from tveto+tphoton (don't ask)) shows no dependence on T-counter. On the other hand, the BCAL/tagger timing difference shows a clear dependence on the T-counters. | ||
+ | [[Image:bcal_timewalk_n7_2007_04_03.gif]] | ||
+ | [[Image:bcal_timewalk_n8_2007_04_03.gif]] | ||
+ | [[Image:bcal_timewalk_s7_2007_04_03.gif]] | ||
+ | [[Image:bcal_timewalk_s8_2007_04_03.gif]] | ||
− | + | [[Image:Bcal_time_res_vs_Ephoton_2007_04_04.gif]] | |
− | [[ | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + |
Revision as of 16:44, 4 April 2007
This page describes a study of the timing resolution for the BCAL beam test using run 2440. There was an issue with the data in the DST trees in which it appears the reference time subtracted from the BCAL TDC values was different than that used for the veto TDC values. The evidence for this is that the veto/tagger timing difference(obtained from tveto+tphoton (don't ask)) shows no dependence on T-counter. On the other hand, the BCAL/tagger timing difference shows a clear dependence on the T-counters.