Difference between revisions of "FDC Backgrounds"
From GlueXWiki
(→Plots) |
(→Items for Discussion) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Items for Discussion == | == Items for Discussion == | ||
− | |||
* Is the maximum number of hits coded into the simulation sufficient for the FDC? If it is applied at the event level, 100 hits is probably not enough. | * Is the maximum number of hits coded into the simulation sufficient for the FDC? If it is applied at the event level, 100 hits is probably not enough. | ||
* How relevant is the increased background as a function of downstream position of the package? | * How relevant is the increased background as a function of downstream position of the package? | ||
** Does this need to be considered when optimizing package placement? | ** Does this need to be considered when optimizing package placement? | ||
** Do/Should the dead regions for each package vary in size depending on downstream location? | ** Do/Should the dead regions for each package vary in size depending on downstream location? | ||
− | + | * Cathode strip readout energy looks to be incorrect? | |
== Plots == | == Plots == |
Revision as of 14:51, 16 January 2007
Back to Background Rate Studies
Detector Configuration
- Double-Hit Resolution: 250 ns
- Threshold: 1 keV
- Strip Threshold: 5 mV
- Maximum Number of Hits: 100
- Dead Zone Radius: 3.5 cm
Items for Discussion
- Is the maximum number of hits coded into the simulation sufficient for the FDC? If it is applied at the event level, 100 hits is probably not enough.
- How relevant is the increased background as a function of downstream position of the package?
- Does this need to be considered when optimizing package placement?
- Do/Should the dead regions for each package vary in size depending on downstream location?
- Cathode strip readout energy looks to be incorrect?
Plots
Plots below are out of date!