Difference between revisions of "Π polarizability Meeting Oct 14, 2019"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "=Meeting Info.= == Meeting Time And Location == 09:00 EST (JLab time) CC A110 ==Connecting== <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> You can connect using [http...")
 
 
Line 40: Line 40:
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
 +
== Minutes ==
 +
''Attending: Elton, Eugene, Tim
  
 
# Previous meeting: [[&pi; polarizability Meeting Oct 9, 2019|Oct 9, 2019]]
 
# Previous meeting: [[&pi; polarizability Meeting Oct 9, 2019|Oct 9, 2019]]
 
# Announcements
 
# Announcements
# TOF Upgrade
+
# [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4180 Link to CPP update at collaboration meeting]
# MWPC status
+
## We reviewed slides from the CPP update at the collaboration meeting
# Other business
+
## Trigger: Estimates indicate the TOF trigger rates will be manageable. We would like to do a test this fall to verify rates at the nominal location.
 +
## MWPC construction: is on track for completion this year.
 +
## Design effort: Concept for "incursion" into the dark box seems workable.
 +
##* Tim's estimates include designer (27 weeks), engineering (11 weeks) and 9 weeks installation. These estimates will to refined with actual design.
 +
##* Stephanie (designer) will wrap up her projects this fall. We could start bi-weekly meetings on mechanical support in Jan.
 +
##* Tim would support the design with some mechanical calculations.
 +
# Discussion
 +
#* Eugene: Readiness Reviews will be conducted following jeopardy PAC next summer and include their feedback. For the ERR, we need to be "as ready as possible"
 +
#* Design/engineering effort: Includes how to support steel on platform; stability of steel; support of MWPCs; installation of steel and MWPCs into position; shape of steel
 +
#* Possible running schedule: Install one summer down; run during fall; leave in place for GlueX run in spring (cannot move forward platform); remove assembly following summer.
 +
#* Simulation projects: optimize location of target; size/shape of Pb lead shield; size/shape of steel absorber; consider effect of possible steel magnetization;
 
# Next meeting
 
# Next meeting
  

Latest revision as of 10:33, 14 October 2019

Meeting Info.

Meeting Time And Location

09:00 EST (JLab time)

CC A110

Connecting

You can connect using BlueJeans Video conferencing (ID: 949 429 419). (Click "Expand" to the right for details -->):

  1. Make sure you have created a BlueJeans account via your JLab CUE account using this link:

  2. Meeting ID: 949 429 419
    • (you may need to type this in, depending how you connect)

  3. If connecting via Web Browser: click this link (no passcode is needed):

  4. If connecting via iOS or Android App:
    • Use your JLab e-mail address to log in and then enter the meeting ID given above to join the meeting

  5. If connecting via Phone: Dial one of the following numbers and then enter the meeting ID above and hit "#" or "##"

  6. If connecting via Polycom unit:
    • Dial 199.48.152.152 or bjn.vc
    • Enter meeting ID above


Minutes

Attending: Elton, Eugene, Tim

  1. Previous meeting: Oct 9, 2019
  2. Announcements
  3. Link to CPP update at collaboration meeting
    1. We reviewed slides from the CPP update at the collaboration meeting
    2. Trigger: Estimates indicate the TOF trigger rates will be manageable. We would like to do a test this fall to verify rates at the nominal location.
    3. MWPC construction: is on track for completion this year.
    4. Design effort: Concept for "incursion" into the dark box seems workable.
      • Tim's estimates include designer (27 weeks), engineering (11 weeks) and 9 weeks installation. These estimates will to refined with actual design.
      • Stephanie (designer) will wrap up her projects this fall. We could start bi-weekly meetings on mechanical support in Jan.
      • Tim would support the design with some mechanical calculations.
  4. Discussion
    • Eugene: Readiness Reviews will be conducted following jeopardy PAC next summer and include their feedback. For the ERR, we need to be "as ready as possible"
    • Design/engineering effort: Includes how to support steel on platform; stability of steel; support of MWPCs; installation of steel and MWPCs into position; shape of steel
    • Possible running schedule: Install one summer down; run during fall; leave in place for GlueX run in spring (cannot move forward platform); remove assembly following summer.
    • Simulation projects: optimize location of target; size/shape of Pb lead shield; size/shape of steel absorber; consider effect of possible steel magnetization;
  5. Next meeting