2016 mcsmear Tracking Updates
From GlueXWiki
Revision as of 13:19, 11 November 2016 by Sdobbs (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "This page contains notes on how to progress with matching tracking performance between data and simulation. The goals are to focus on changes we can implement in the next mon...")
This page contains notes on how to progress with matching tracking performance between data and simulation.
The goals are to focus on changes we can implement in the next month and develop a plan for future studies.
Previous notes
We can proceed in two steps: update the detector hit objects, then study the performance of reconstructed tracks.
Detector hits
Two main issues to focus on: efficiency and resolution
- Efficiency
- CDC
- Include known dead/inefficient channels into the simulation. Mike Staib can send a list of these to Sean, who can include in them into the CCDB.
- Ineffiency as a function of drift time: eventually we'll want to come up with some per-wire correction, but it would be useful to see what happens if we apply some average correction. From Mike's previous studies, the difference does not seem huge.
- FDC
- We have started to include information on dead wires in the CCDB. Alex A. and Sean should review this list.
- What is the best way to parameterize the FDC inefficiency? Is the easiest way to do this at the psuedohit level?
- CDC
- Resolution
