Difference between revisions of "2017-01 recon ver02 plans"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
#* [[File:R30590_HistMacro_BCALReconstruction_p1.png|300px]] [[File:R30590_HistMacro_FCALReconstruction_p1.png|300px]] | #* [[File:R30590_HistMacro_BCALReconstruction_p1.png|300px]] [[File:R30590_HistMacro_FCALReconstruction_p1.png|300px]] | ||
# What is the bump in SC monitoring delta T distributions at ~ -8 ns? | # What is the bump in SC monitoring delta T distributions at ~ -8 ns? | ||
| − | #* [[File: | + | #* [[File:R30590_HistMacro_SCReconstruction_p2.png|300px]] |
# What is the inefficiency in the TOF matching efficiency near the beam hole due to? | # What is the inefficiency in the TOF matching efficiency near the beam hole due to? | ||
#* [[File:R30590_HistMacro_Matching_TOF2.png|500px]] | #* [[File:R30590_HistMacro_Matching_TOF2.png|500px]] | ||
Revision as of 22:35, 20 September 2017
These improvements are expected to go into the next round of reconstructed data:
- improved CDC dE/dx calculation
- use of ADC amplitude instead of integral - dE/dx vs theta
- updated truncation value
- improved TOF calibrations
- use of ADC amplitude instead of integral
-
new SC attenuation length corrections - BCAL charged track clusterizer
- FCAL updates
- Updated gains (fix problems with inner rings)
- Updated timing (fix high-rate running problem)
- Update geometry?
- updated charged/neutral error matrices?
Outstanding questions:
- What is the bump in BCAL & FCAL monitoring delta T distributions at +4 ns?
-
- What is the bump in SC monitoring delta T distributions at ~ -8 ns?
-
- What is the inefficiency in the TOF matching efficiency near the beam hole due to?
-
