Difference between revisions of "Alternative readout"
From GlueXWiki
(→Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies) |
(→Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=832 Readout of the barrel calorimeter based on conventional photomultiplier tubes] (GlueX-doc-832, Jun 2007) | * [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=832 Readout of the barrel calorimeter based on conventional photomultiplier tubes] (GlueX-doc-832, Jun 2007) | ||
| + | * Issues that need to be considered (rough outline) | ||
| + | ** light guides and collection | ||
| + | ** Light detector | ||
| + | ** magnetic fringe fields / shielding | ||
| + | ** cabling / number and sizes of cables / signal degradation | ||
| + | ** dark box / "wrapping of detector" | ||
| + | ** impact on photon reconstruction [what is our current geometry?] | ||
| + | ** cost estimates | ||
* Comments: | * Comments: | ||
** Area of fibers cover 50% of the area of the end of the Bcal. Reduction is 2. | ** Area of fibers cover 50% of the area of the end of the Bcal. Reduction is 2. | ||
Revision as of 08:32, 9 June 2008
Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies
- Readout of the barrel calorimeter based on conventional photomultiplier tubes (GlueX-doc-832, Jun 2007)
- Issues that need to be considered (rough outline)
- light guides and collection
- Light detector
- magnetic fringe fields / shielding
- cabling / number and sizes of cables / signal degradation
- dark box / "wrapping of detector"
- impact on photon reconstruction [what is our current geometry?]
- cost estimates
- Comments:
- Area of fibers cover 50% of the area of the end of the Bcal. Reduction is 2.
- Area of the output of the WC (1.2 cm2) reduces the readout by 4cm2/1.2cm2 = 3.3.
- The Sketch below is to illustrate the space constraints for any light collection and readout system:
