Difference between revisions of "Alternative readout"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies)
(Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
*#* planacons, wire mesh pmts
 
*#* planacons, wire mesh pmts
 
*# magnetic fringe fields / shielding
 
*# magnetic fringe fields / shielding
*#* preliminary field calculations using ANSYS available (on hard copy)
+
*#* [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=1067  Preliminary field calculations using ANSYS available]
 
*# cabling / number and sizes of cables / signal degradation
 
*# cabling / number and sizes of cables / signal degradation
 
*#* cable differences between various detectors, e.g. HV  
 
*#* cable differences between various detectors, e.g. HV  

Revision as of 09:46, 9 June 2008

Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies

  • Readout of the barrel calorimeter based on conventional photomultiplier tubes (GlueX-doc-832, Jun 2007)
  • Issues that need to be considered (rough outline)
    1. light guides and collection
      • fiber light guides? re-evaluation of the granularity for the inner cal
    2. light detector
      • planacons, wire mesh pmts
    3. magnetic fringe fields / shielding
    4. cabling / number and sizes of cables / signal degradation
      • cable differences between various detectors, e.g. HV
    5. dark box / "wrapping of detector"
      • presently no scheme has been worked out for any scenario
    6. impact on photon reconstruction [what is our current geometry?]
      • what material is included for the WCs/SiPMs/cables?
    7. cost estimates
  • Comments:
    • Area of fibers cover 50% of the area of the end of the Bcal. Reduction is 2.
    • Area of the output of the WC (1.2 cm2) reduces the readout by 4cm2/1.2cm2 = 3.3.
  • The Sketch below is to illustrate the space constraints for any light collection and readout system:

Bcal guides.gif