Difference between revisions of "August 1, 2008 Software"
(→Agenda) |
(Incomplete) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
| − | Attendees: '' | + | Attendees: David L. (chair), Simon T., Beni Z., Elke A., Sascha S., Mark I., Herun Y., Elton S., Jim S., Eugene C. |
| + | |||
| + | Phone: Blake L. (Univ. Regina), Alexander O.(FSU), Matt S.(IU) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===BCAL Reconstruction Status=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Blake gave a brief status report on some of the recent work done on the BCAL reconstruction and simulation. Much of this was started during a recent trip Blake made to IU to work with Matt and Mihajlo. The main changes to the code were: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Time smearing of the BCAL hits | ||
| + | * Low energy threshold recalculated and set | ||
| + | |||
| + | Results of a study comparing resolutions of a BCAL design with the nominal 6x4 and the alternate 3x3 inner region readout segmentation were presented. The 6x4 segmentation corresponds to a readout design using SiPMs and the 3x3 using Planacon PMTs. The studies indicated very little difference in the energy or angular resolutions of the 2 schemes. It was noted, however, that the same low energy threshold (4.8MeV) was used for both cases even though the Planacon design is expected to have a lower threshold. The resolution has a dependence on the low energy threshold. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Discussion items=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====TOF Reconstruction==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====Hall-D Batch Farm Priority==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====''gxtwist'' location in repository==== | ||
Revision as of 15:58, 1 August 2008
Contents
Agenda
- Review minutes from July 18, 2008 Software meeting
- BCAL Reconstruction Status (Blake L.)
- added time smearing, changed threshold to 4.8 MeV (Green Fibres/SiPM)
- Comparison of 3x3 vs. 6x4 BCAL Inner Segmenation
- Discussion Items:
- TOF reconstruction
- Hall-D share on JLab Batch farm
- gxtwist location and build scheme
- Action Items
Participating
Location
The meeting will be at 1:00pm in Cebaf Center F326.
Telephone
To connect by telephone: 1.) dial:
800-377-8846 : US 888-276-7715 : Canada 302-709-8424 : International
2.) enter participant code: 39527048# (remember the "#")
Video Conferencing
We will attempt an EVO connection for this meeting. We have a reasonable expectation that this will work.
Minutes
Attendees: David L. (chair), Simon T., Beni Z., Elke A., Sascha S., Mark I., Herun Y., Elton S., Jim S., Eugene C.
Phone: Blake L. (Univ. Regina), Alexander O.(FSU), Matt S.(IU)
BCAL Reconstruction Status
Blake gave a brief status report on some of the recent work done on the BCAL reconstruction and simulation. Much of this was started during a recent trip Blake made to IU to work with Matt and Mihajlo. The main changes to the code were:
- Time smearing of the BCAL hits
- Low energy threshold recalculated and set
Results of a study comparing resolutions of a BCAL design with the nominal 6x4 and the alternate 3x3 inner region readout segmentation were presented. The 6x4 segmentation corresponds to a readout design using SiPMs and the 3x3 using Planacon PMTs. The studies indicated very little difference in the energy or angular resolutions of the 2 schemes. It was noted, however, that the same low energy threshold (4.8MeV) was used for both cases even though the Planacon design is expected to have a lower threshold. The resolution has a dependence on the low energy threshold.
Discussion items
TOF Reconstruction
Hall-D Batch Farm Priority
gxtwist location in repository
Action items
Next Meeting
TBD
