Difference between revisions of "BCAL Reconstruction Meeting 2013-05-09"
From GlueXWiki
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
# [[BCAL Reconstruction Issues]] | # [[BCAL Reconstruction Issues]] | ||
# [[BCAL Reconstruction Algorithms]] | # [[BCAL Reconstruction Algorithms]] | ||
| + | # Andrei and Irina will check their simulations in the 5-module setup to ensure that energy is not leaking out of the single module. | ||
| + | # Will will check whether the "too many clusters" issue is due to the 4th layer and whether it gets worse as theta becomes more forward. | ||
| + | # Regina to check 2006 beam test for this effect in the read layers. | ||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
| Line 31: | Line 34: | ||
''Attendees: David (JLab), Will Levine (CMU), Andrei, Zisis (Regina)'' | ''Attendees: David (JLab), Will Levine (CMU), Andrei, Zisis (Regina)'' | ||
| + | # Action Items: none | ||
| + | # Updates | ||
| + | ## Andrei & Irina: Andrei presented the simulations from the single-module standalone MC, showing the energy deposition centroids. Two observations are apparent: a) as theta decreases from 90 deg, the centroid loci for the triple and quadruple layers deviated significantly from the direction of the incoming photons and b) even though the 3rd and 4th row clusters are not on the line, they belong to the event so they their energy needs to be accounted for, although they should not be used untreated to define the photon path through the layers. Other observations include the broadening of the 4th layer and the spread of the 1st layer to smaller z values. David reminded us that the field near the outer layers has a radial component. Zisis mentioned that the 2006 beam tests may not have many events in the rear layers sine the tagger energy went up only to 650 MeV. | ||
| + | ## Will compared the KLOE and IU codes. | ||
| + | Discuss and prioritize the Reconstruction Issues and produce a timetable for the work. | ||
| + | # Any other business: | ||
| + | ## Light guide gluing issue: | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 9 May 2013
Teleconference Time: 11:15 a.m. EDT
- ESNET (Number is 8542553) and EVO session (GlueX Calorimetry meeting room)
- Phone connection only upon request.
- +1-866-740-1260 : US+Canada
- +1-303-248-0285 : International
- then enter participant code: 3421244# (remember the "#").
- or www.readytalk.com (and code without the #)
Participant Direct Lines
- JLab Phone: in CC F326 is 757-269-6460 (usual room)
- JLab Phone in CC L207 is 757-269-7084
- Phone in the Regina Video-conference Suite is 306-585-4204
Action Items
- BCAL Reconstruction Issues
- BCAL Reconstruction Algorithms
- Andrei and Irina will check their simulations in the 5-module setup to ensure that energy is not leaking out of the single module.
- Will will check whether the "too many clusters" issue is due to the 4th layer and whether it gets worse as theta becomes more forward.
- Regina to check 2006 beam test for this effect in the read layers.
Agenda
- Action Items
- Updates
- Will
- Andrei & Irina: Shower centroid distributions
- Discuss and prioritize the Reconstruction Issues and produce a timetable for the work.
- Any other business
Minutes
Attendees: David (JLab), Will Levine (CMU), Andrei, Zisis (Regina)
- Action Items: none
- Updates
- Andrei & Irina: Andrei presented the simulations from the single-module standalone MC, showing the energy deposition centroids. Two observations are apparent: a) as theta decreases from 90 deg, the centroid loci for the triple and quadruple layers deviated significantly from the direction of the incoming photons and b) even though the 3rd and 4th row clusters are not on the line, they belong to the event so they their energy needs to be accounted for, although they should not be used untreated to define the photon path through the layers. Other observations include the broadening of the 4th layer and the spread of the 1st layer to smaller z values. David reminded us that the field near the outer layers has a radial component. Zisis mentioned that the 2006 beam tests may not have many events in the rear layers sine the tagger energy went up only to 650 MeV.
- Will compared the KLOE and IU codes.
Discuss and prioritize the Reconstruction Issues and produce a timetable for the work.
- Any other business:
- Light guide gluing issue:
