Difference between revisions of "BCal Beam Test Plots, December 19, 2006"
From GlueXWiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | *cuts used: | ||
+ | trig==8 Nphotons==1 Ntdctrig>=8 tveto<-100 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
* (Figure 1.) ''<math>E_{beam}/E_{cal}</math>'' distribution using Monte Carlo corrected phototube calibration factors | * (Figure 1.) ''<math>E_{beam}/E_{cal}</math>'' distribution using Monte Carlo corrected phototube calibration factors | ||
[[Image:Ebeamecal.gif|thumb|400px|left|Figure 1.]] | [[Image:Ebeamecal.gif|thumb|400px|left|Figure 1.]] |
Latest revision as of 18:18, 20 December 2006
- cuts used:
trig==8 Nphotons==1 Ntdctrig>=8 tveto<-100
- (Figure 1.) distribution using Monte Carlo corrected phototube calibration factors
- (Figure 2.) Plots of Z for different beam energy cuts where :
Figure 2.
- (Figure 3.)Means vs E_{beam} from Gaussian fits of z from Monte Carlo corrected data
- (Figure 4.)Sigma vs E_{beam} from Gaussian fits of z from Monte Carlo corrected data. The curve is a fit to the function a/sqrt(E[Gev]) + b where and a = 0.046 +/- 0.005 and b = 0.033 +/- 0.005. This is very similar to Alex's note from December 16, 2006 where a = 0.050 and b = 0.020.