Difference between revisions of "BLTWG Meeting 04/23/2009"
From GlueXWiki
Senderovich (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Place: EVO and ESNET (with telephone bridge) | * Place: EVO and ESNET (with telephone bridge) | ||
* Connecting: instructions are [[Tagged Beam Group Biweekly Meetings|here]] | * Connecting: instructions are [[Tagged Beam Group Biweekly Meetings|here]] | ||
| − | * Present: Richard J., | + | * Present: Richard J., Jim S., Alex S., Igor S.,Lipeng G., Ashot G, and Tim W. |
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
# Review of the machine interface document - ''Jim'' | # Review of the machine interface document - ''Jim'' | ||
# Review of the tagger magnet spec - ''Jim'' | # Review of the tagger magnet spec - ''Jim'' | ||
| − | # Two page beam line summary document - ''Jim'' | + | # [http://zeus.phys.uconn.edu/halld/glueXreviews/taggerRev-11-2008/photonsource-2page.pdf Two page beam line summary document] - ''Jim'' |
# Agenda for beamline section of collaboration meeting - ''Richard'' | # Agenda for beamline section of collaboration meeting - ''Richard'' | ||
# Possible projects for new collaborators - ''Richard'' | # Possible projects for new collaborators - ''Richard'' | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
====Preparation for the CHESS run in two weeks==== | ====Preparation for the CHESS run in two weeks==== | ||
''Note from Franz Klein:'' | ''Note from Franz Klein:'' | ||
| − | : I have the goniometer target ladder at home: the 'good 50' looks more darkened than 2 1/2 years ago - for sure an interesting comparison to do! I copied the goniometer and beam info from g13 (and parts of g9). I probably cannot give you a pixel-to-pixel variation of the charge but for a position information of ~100- | + | : I have the goniometer target ladder at home: the 'good 50' looks more darkened than 2 1/2 years ago - for sure an interesting comparison to do! I copied the goniometer and beam info from g13 (and parts of g9). I probably cannot give you a pixel-to-pixel variation of the charge but for a position information of ~100-150 microns. |
: It would be good to find out when Ken wants us to be at CHESS; the last times he spent a day or so to set up the beamline - it would be good to know whether he is doing that on Friday or the weekend? Talk to you later this week. | : It would be good to find out when Ken wants us to be at CHESS; the last times he spent a day or so to set up the beamline - it would be good to know whether he is doing that on Friday or the weekend? Talk to you later this week. | ||
====Prep for tagger design internal review at JLab==== | ====Prep for tagger design internal review at JLab==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Discussion with PrimeX collaborators==== | ||
| + | Ashot/Lipeng: Suggesting perhaps tagger end-point work or pair spectrometer? MRI? | ||
| + | |||
| + | The pair spectrometer is currently the piece most conspicuously lacking stewardship. The higher energy resolution requirement will demand precise field maps, likely for both tagger and pair spectrometer magnets. Understanding of stability of these values over time will be important. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:48, 20 April 2009
- Time: 11:00 EST
- Place: EVO and ESNET (with telephone bridge)
- Connecting: instructions are here
- Present: Richard J., Jim S., Alex S., Igor S.,Lipeng G., Ashot G, and Tim W.
Contents
Agenda
- Preparation for the CHESS run in two weeks - Richard
- Preparation for tagger design internal review at JLab - Tim
- Meeting on photon beam stabilization scheme - Jim
- Review of the machine interface document - Jim
- Review of the tagger magnet spec - Jim
- Two page beam line summary document - Jim
- Agenda for beamline section of collaboration meeting - Richard
- Possible projects for new collaborators - Richard
Notes by R. Jones
Preparation for the CHESS run in two weeks
Note from Franz Klein:
- I have the goniometer target ladder at home: the 'good 50' looks more darkened than 2 1/2 years ago - for sure an interesting comparison to do! I copied the goniometer and beam info from g13 (and parts of g9). I probably cannot give you a pixel-to-pixel variation of the charge but for a position information of ~100-150 microns.
- It would be good to find out when Ken wants us to be at CHESS; the last times he spent a day or so to set up the beamline - it would be good to know whether he is doing that on Friday or the weekend? Talk to you later this week.
Prep for tagger design internal review at JLab
Discussion with PrimeX collaborators
Ashot/Lipeng: Suggesting perhaps tagger end-point work or pair spectrometer? MRI?
The pair spectrometer is currently the piece most conspicuously lacking stewardship. The higher energy resolution requirement will demand precise field maps, likely for both tagger and pair spectrometer magnets. Understanding of stability of these values over time will be important.
