Difference between revisions of "CDC Backgrounds"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Items for Discussion)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
* Should stereo geometry be so noticeable in background rate?  If the noise source is far upstream, then stereo straws will present a large cross section to the noise source than axial straws.
 
* Should stereo geometry be so noticeable in background rate?  If the noise source is far upstream, then stereo straws will present a large cross section to the noise source than axial straws.
 +
''This question is under study, results forthcoming. [rtj]''
  
 +
* There seems to be something wrong with CDC layer 18.  Is this just a bug in the geometry or something else?
 +
''This was a bug in the hdds geometry, due to a typographical error in the xml source document.  The fix has been checked into the central repository. [rtj]''
  
 
== Plots ==
 
== Plots ==

Revision as of 15:08, 23 January 2007

Back to Background Rate Studies


Detector Configuration

  • Double-Hit Resolution: 250 ns
  • Threshold: 1 keV
  • Maximum Number of Hits (per Event): 100


Items for Discussion

  • Should stereo geometry be so noticeable in background rate? If the noise source is far upstream, then stereo straws will present a large cross section to the noise source than axial straws.

This question is under study, results forthcoming. [rtj]

  • There seems to be something wrong with CDC layer 18. Is this just a bug in the geometry or something else?

This was a bug in the hdds geometry, due to a typographical error in the xml source document. The fix has been checked into the central repository. [rtj]

Plots

The average background rate per straw in Hz as a function of ring number in the CDC.
A double-log plot of the energy of all hits in the CDC. The spectrum cuts off at 1 keV due to the GEANT threshold.
The integral of the energy spectrum above. Plotted on the y axis is the fraction of the spectrum above the corresponding x axis cutoff.