Difference between revisions of "CHESS X-ray measurements 5/2009"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "In April, 2009 we had about a week of beam time at CHESS in Ithaca, NY. This time, Ken had mounted a new pair of silicon crystals in the primary monochromator box. These crystal...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In April, 2009 we had about a week of beam time at CHESS in Ithaca, NY. This time, Ken had mounted a new pair of silicon crystals in the primary monochromator box.  These crystals were only a couple mm thick, and about 10cm x 10cm in size.  Each bounce gave an expansion factor close to 4, with a combined b in the range 16-18.  We had a great deal of difficulty aligning the crystals, and were never able to get a beam spot large enough to cover the entire target.  Instead, we had to repeat the rocking curve scans many times, stepping the monochromator in small increments between each scan, until the entire target surface had been exposed.  These mono crystals had been salvaged from scraps that were left over from a previous project.  At the end of this run, it was resolved that we needed to cut our own custom crystals, which would be significantly thicker and have b closer to 10.  Targets examined were:
+
In April, 2009 we had about a week of beam time at CHESS in Ithaca, NY. Participating in this run were CHESS staff scientist Ken Finkelstein and GlueX collaborators Richard Jones, Igor Senderovich, Franz Klein, and Pawel Nadel-Turonski.  We had a great deal of difficulty aligning the mono crystals, and were never able to get a beam spot large enough to cover the entire target.  Instead, we had to repeat the rocking curve scans many times, stepping the monochromator in small increments between each scan, until the entire target surface had been exposed.  These were the same mono crystals as had been used for the successful 11/2007 run, but something had changed.  These crystals had been originally salvaged from scraps that were left over from a previous project.  At the end of this run, it was resolved that we need to cut our own custom crystals, which would be significantly thicker, and have ''b'' closer to 10.
 +
 
 +
The other major difficulty that was diagnosed and overcome during this run was with vibrations of the target in the mount. The target had been mounted by stretching thin tungsten wires across a square aluminum frame and gluing the diamond to the wires.  This technique has been used before at Mainz and in Hall B.  It was during this run that we discovered that this mounting technique is not going to be satisfactory for Hall D, from the standpoint of mechanical stability.  Targets examined were:
  
 
* BNL-300 : a type-3 CVD diamond monocrystal 4mm x 4mm and 300 microns thick, on load to us from Brookhaven National Lab.
 
* BNL-300 : a type-3 CVD diamond monocrystal 4mm x 4mm and 300 microns thick, on load to us from Brookhaven National Lab.
Line 5: Line 7:
 
* Platinum mask : a platinum mask that absorbs X-rays, with a pattern of tiny holes etched in it, useful for calibrating and focusing the camera.
 
* Platinum mask : a platinum mask that absorbs X-rays, with a pattern of tiny holes etched in it, useful for calibrating and focusing the camera.
  
The mask images were used to set the focus on the camera. Once the focus was set, we collected and stored a few images, to be analyzed offline to determine the length scale and point spread function of the camera. All data are archived at UConn.
+
All data are archived at UConn. An overview of what was learned from this run and a sampling of the results were shown at the May 2009 collaboration meeting in [http://zeus.phys.uconn.edu/halld/glueXmeetings/mtg-5-2009/diamonds-5-2009.ppt a talk by R. Jones].

Latest revision as of 18:06, 29 November 2011

In April, 2009 we had about a week of beam time at CHESS in Ithaca, NY. Participating in this run were CHESS staff scientist Ken Finkelstein and GlueX collaborators Richard Jones, Igor Senderovich, Franz Klein, and Pawel Nadel-Turonski. We had a great deal of difficulty aligning the mono crystals, and were never able to get a beam spot large enough to cover the entire target. Instead, we had to repeat the rocking curve scans many times, stepping the monochromator in small increments between each scan, until the entire target surface had been exposed. These were the same mono crystals as had been used for the successful 11/2007 run, but something had changed. These crystals had been originally salvaged from scraps that were left over from a previous project. At the end of this run, it was resolved that we need to cut our own custom crystals, which would be significantly thicker, and have b closer to 10.

The other major difficulty that was diagnosed and overcome during this run was with vibrations of the target in the mount. The target had been mounted by stretching thin tungsten wires across a square aluminum frame and gluing the diamond to the wires. This technique has been used before at Mainz and in Hall B. It was during this run that we discovered that this mounting technique is not going to be satisfactory for Hall D, from the standpoint of mechanical stability. Targets examined were:

  • BNL-300 : a type-3 CVD diamond monocrystal 4mm x 4mm and 300 microns thick, on load to us from Brookhaven National Lab.
  • HallB-G50 : an older HPHT diamond from the Hall B CB source, has been used as a radiator for production running since it was last examined at CHESS, in 11/2006.
  • Platinum mask : a platinum mask that absorbs X-rays, with a pattern of tiny holes etched in it, useful for calibrating and focusing the camera.

All data are archived at UConn. An overview of what was learned from this run and a sampling of the results were shown at the May 2009 collaboration meeting in a talk by R. Jones.