Difference between revisions of "Discussion of e+/e- tertiary beams in Hall D"
From GlueXWiki
(→Running conditions of 2-photon experiment in Hall B) |
(→Running conditions of 2-photon experiment in Hall B) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*: max power in photon beam: 5.9 W | *: max power in photon beam: 5.9 W | ||
| − | For comparison, here are the maximum design numbers for polarized running with GlueX. Note that these rates are a bit higher than the standard high-luminosity running conditions, but these are the upper limits that we simulated when we designed the collimator cave shielding and beam line instrumentation. | + | * For comparison, here are the maximum design numbers for polarized running with GlueX. Note that these rates are a bit higher than the standard high-luminosity running conditions, but these are the upper limits that we simulated when we designed the collimator cave shielding and beam line instrumentation. |
*: primary beam energy: 12 GeV | *: primary beam energy: 12 GeV | ||
*: max beam current: 3 μA | *: max beam current: 3 μA | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*: max power in photon beam: 4.8 W | *: max power in photon beam: 4.8 W | ||
| − | Imagine just taking the running conditions from the TPE experiment in Hall B and replicate them in Hall D, sticking as close as possible to the GlueX photon beam configuration. | + | * Imagine just taking the running conditions from the TPE experiment in Hall B and replicate them in Hall D, sticking as close as possible to the GlueX photon beam configuration. |
*: primary beam energy: 12 GeV | *: primary beam energy: 12 GeV | ||
*: max beam current: 3 μA | *: max beam current: 3 μA | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*: max power in photon beam: 12 W | *: max power in photon beam: 12 W | ||
| − | The radiator thickness was increased just enough to get the same photon beam intensity as the Hall B experiment. Notice that the total photon beam is only a factor 2.5 higher absorbed dose in the collimator cave than expected for high-luminosity running in GlueX. A more conservative configuration with the same photon beam power might be the following, with the same photon beam intensity. | + | * The radiator thickness was increased just enough to get the same photon beam intensity as the Hall B experiment. Notice that the total photon beam is only a factor 2.5 higher absorbed dose in the collimator cave than expected for high-luminosity running in GlueX. A more conservative configuration with the same photon beam power might be the following, with the same photon beam intensity. |
*: primary beam energy: 12 GeV | *: primary beam energy: 12 GeV | ||
*: max beam current: 300 nA | *: max beam current: 300 nA | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*: max power in photon beam: 12 W | *: max power in photon beam: 12 W | ||
| − | Another idea to think about: | + | * Another idea to think about: |
*: O(m/E) precollimation of photon beam at exit from tagger hall would give factor 2.7 reduction in beam power, also harden the spectrum. | *: O(m/E) precollimation of photon beam at exit from tagger hall would give factor 2.7 reduction in beam power, also harden the spectrum. | ||
*: 1m/E collimator @ 30m (radiator - tagger hall exit) has diameter 2.6mm which is feasible in terms of alignment and beam focal spot size. Under these conditions, the following would apply. | *: 1m/E collimator @ 30m (radiator - tagger hall exit) has diameter 2.6mm which is feasible in terms of alignment and beam focal spot size. Under these conditions, the following would apply. | ||
Revision as of 13:33, 31 October 2012
Running conditions of 2-photon experiment in Hall B
- based on numbers in this talk by Robert Bennett
- primary beam energy: 5.5 GeV
- max beam current: 120 nA
- radiator thickness: 0.009 radiation lengths
- max power in photon beam: 5.9 W
- For comparison, here are the maximum design numbers for polarized running with GlueX. Note that these rates are a bit higher than the standard high-luminosity running conditions, but these are the upper limits that we simulated when we designed the collimator cave shielding and beam line instrumentation.
- primary beam energy: 12 GeV
- max beam current: 3 μA
- radiator thickness: 0.0001 radiation lengths
- max power in photon beam: 4.8 W
- Imagine just taking the running conditions from the TPE experiment in Hall B and replicate them in Hall D, sticking as close as possible to the GlueX photon beam configuration.
- primary beam energy: 12 GeV
- max beam current: 3 μA
- radiator thickness: 0.00025 radiation lengths (50 micron diamond)
- max power in photon beam: 12 W
- The radiator thickness was increased just enough to get the same photon beam intensity as the Hall B experiment. Notice that the total photon beam is only a factor 2.5 higher absorbed dose in the collimator cave than expected for high-luminosity running in GlueX. A more conservative configuration with the same photon beam power might be the following, with the same photon beam intensity.
- primary beam energy: 12 GeV
- max beam current: 300 nA
- radiator thickness: 0.0025 radiation lengths (500 micron diamond)
- max power in photon beam: 12 W
- Another idea to think about:
- O(m/E) precollimation of photon beam at exit from tagger hall would give factor 2.7 reduction in beam power, also harden the spectrum.
- 1m/E collimator @ 30m (radiator - tagger hall exit) has diameter 2.6mm which is feasible in terms of alignment and beam focal spot size. Under these conditions, the following would apply.
- primary beam energy: 12 GeV
- max beam current: 300 nA
- radiator thickness: 0.0025 radiation lengths (500 micron diamond)
- max power in photon beam: 4.5 W
Now one is fully within the limits of the beamline design for GlueX, in terms of photon beam power being incident at the collimator cave.
