Difference between revisions of "FCAL Reconstruction 04/08/2012"
From GlueXWiki
(Created page with "There is a tunable parameter in the FCAL code with default: <code>MIN_CLUSTER_BLOCK_COUNT = 2;</code> At lower energies (<~500 MeV), this causes photon reconstruction efficienc...") |
(→FCAL energy corrections) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==FCAL energy corrections== | ==FCAL energy corrections== | ||
What's the deal with FCAL energy correction? current code by Mihajlo ([http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=1093 DocDB 1093]) | What's the deal with FCAL energy correction? current code by Mihajlo ([http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=1093 DocDB 1093]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | <math>E_c = AE_\gamma(1+\frac{1}{2})</math> | ||
Revision as of 20:37, 8 April 2012
There is a tunable parameter in the FCAL code with default:
MIN_CLUSTER_BLOCK_COUNT = 2;
At lower energies (<~500 MeV), this causes photon reconstruction efficiency to be lower because often only one block has energy deposited in it (above the 20 MeV threshold in mcsmear).
In single photon sample:
- red:
MIN_CLUSTER_BLOCK_COUNT = 1 - black:
MIN_CLUSTER_BLOCK_COUNT = 2
In b1pi events:
- Overall efficiency increases by ~6%: 78% -> 84%
- 15% in total photon count (after timing cut) (1.18->1.36)
1-block "clusters" will collect less energy than multi-block clusters of same photon energy-->will affect energy calibration, energy resolution
FCAL energy corrections
What's the deal with FCAL energy correction? current code by Mihajlo (DocDB 1093)
