Difference between revisions of "FDC geometry study"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
** No half-cell offset between neighboring wire planes. | ** No half-cell offset between neighboring wire planes. | ||
* Alternate geometry GeomB | * Alternate geometry GeomB | ||
| − | ** Configuration of chambers: UU' (0 degrees), VV'(-60 degrees), | + | ** Configuration of chambers: UU' (0 degrees), VV'(-60 degrees), WW'(+60 degrees) |
| + | ** Half-cell offset between primed and unprimed chambers | ||
| + | * In both cases I studied 3 cm separation between wire planes (nominal geometry) and 2 cm separation. | ||
| + | * Single pion tracks (p=0.5,1.0,1.5,2.5 GeV/c) generated from the center of the target and analyzed with the standard reconstruction | ||
| + | ** The Lorentz effect was turned on, but no other smearing was applied | ||
| + | ** The Riemann Fit was used to fit segments and determine the sign for the correction to the Lorentz effect | ||
| + | ** Full track reconstruction with standard (ALT1) least squares fitter | ||
Revision as of 09:14, 17 November 2008
- The baseline geometry (GeomA) is Hall-D Geometry V4.
- Configuration of chambers: U (0 degrees), V (+60 degrees), W (-60 degrees)
- No half-cell offset between neighboring wire planes.
- Alternate geometry GeomB
- Configuration of chambers: UU' (0 degrees), VV'(-60 degrees), WW'(+60 degrees)
- Half-cell offset between primed and unprimed chambers
- In both cases I studied 3 cm separation between wire planes (nominal geometry) and 2 cm separation.
- Single pion tracks (p=0.5,1.0,1.5,2.5 GeV/c) generated from the center of the target and analyzed with the standard reconstruction
- The Lorentz effect was turned on, but no other smearing was applied
- The Riemann Fit was used to fit segments and determine the sign for the correction to the Lorentz effect
- Full track reconstruction with standard (ALT1) least squares fitter
