Difference between revisions of "Feb 8, 2011 Calibration/Monitoring"
From GlueXWiki
(→Tentative Agenda) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
= Tentative Agenda = | = Tentative Agenda = | ||
| + | # MoU | ||
# Discuss Action Items. | # Discuss Action Items. | ||
| − | # Review goals/objectives of Monitoring system | + | # Review goals/objectives of Monitoring system; summary of discussions at Collaboration Meeting |
| − | # Presentation to CALWG | + | # Presentation to CALWG. |
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
''Attendees: Christina (Athens), Elton (JLab), Zisis (Regina)'' | ''Attendees: Christina (Athens), Elton (JLab), Zisis (Regina)'' | ||
Revision as of 15:15, 7 February 2011
Teleconference Time: 09:00 CST (Regina) / 10:00 EST / 17:00 GMT+2 (Athens)
- ESNET preferred, EVO as a backup
Background information
- Monitoring R&D issues for the relative gain calibration and monitoring system for the calorimeters and possibly other detector systems.
- Calibration Specifications Table for BCAL, FCAL, TOF and START
- Calibration and Monitoring System Meetings Previous minutes
Action Items
- Why was the dynamic range of the APD tested over 20-450? Where there intrinsic limitations? Can it be extended to form a ratio of 400?
- Can George calculate the % deviation from linearity on his plot?
- Can George verify that the two-setting operation (low bias for near, high bias for far SiPM flashing) is feasible?
- What is the approximate power dissipation for each board? (Just LPM since LPCM will be further away).
- Zisis will bounce another idea for the one-setting operation mode.
- USM should be contacted to send more LGs to Athens (and eventually Regina).
Tentative Agenda
- MoU
- Discuss Action Items.
- Review goals/objectives of Monitoring system; summary of discussions at Collaboration Meeting
- Presentation to CALWG.
Minutes
Attendees: Christina (Athens), Elton (JLab), Zisis (Regina)
