Difference between revisions of "Feb 8, 2011 Calibration/Monitoring"
From GlueXWiki
(→Tentative Agenda) |
(→Action Items) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
= Action Items = | = Action Items = | ||
| − | # Why was the dynamic range of the APD tested over 20-450? Where there intrinsic limitations? Can it be extended to form a ratio of 400? | + | # <strike> Why was the dynamic range of the APD tested over 20-450? Where there intrinsic limitations? Can it be extended to form a ratio of 400? </strike> |
# Can George calculate the % deviation from linearity on his plot? | # Can George calculate the % deviation from linearity on his plot? | ||
| − | # Can George verify that the two-setting operation (low bias for near, high bias for far SiPM flashing) is feasible? | + | # <strike> Can George verify that the two-setting operation (low bias for near, high bias for far SiPM flashing) is feasible? </strike> |
| − | # What is the approximate power dissipation for each board? (Just LPM since LPCM will be further away). | + | # <strike> What is the approximate power dissipation for each board? (Just LPM since LPCM will be further away). </strike> |
| − | # Zisis will bounce another idea for the one-setting operation mode. | + | # <strike> Zisis will bounce another idea for the one-setting operation mode. </strike> |
# USM should be contacted to send more LGs to Athens (and eventually Regina). | # USM should be contacted to send more LGs to Athens (and eventually Regina). | ||
Revision as of 12:31, 8 February 2011
Teleconference Time: 09:00 CST (Regina) / 10:00 EST / 17:00 GMT+2 (Athens)
- ESNET preferred, EVO as a backup
Background information
- Monitoring R&D issues for the relative gain calibration and monitoring system for the calorimeters and possibly other detector systems.
- Calibration Specifications Table for BCAL, FCAL, TOF and START
- Calibration and Monitoring System Meetings Previous minutes
Action Items
-
Why was the dynamic range of the APD tested over 20-450? Where there intrinsic limitations? Can it be extended to form a ratio of 400? - Can George calculate the % deviation from linearity on his plot?
-
Can George verify that the two-setting operation (low bias for near, high bias for far SiPM flashing) is feasible? -
What is the approximate power dissipation for each board? (Just LPM since LPCM will be further away). -
Zisis will bounce another idea for the one-setting operation mode. - USM should be contacted to send more LGs to Athens (and eventually Regina).
Tentative Agenda
- MoU
- Discuss Action Items.
- Review goals/objectives of Monitoring system; summary of discussions at Collaboration Meeting
- Presentation to CALWG.
Minutes
Attendees: Christina (Athens), Elton (JLab), Zisis (Regina)
