Difference between revisions of "February 17, 2009 Physics"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 14: Line 14:
  
  
* Unconstrained invariant mass (left) and fit confidence level (right) for '''pi0''' candidates after the mass-constrained kinematic fit. Candidates with Chi2 < 3(5) are shown in red (blue). This can be compared with Figure 5.12 in  
+
* Unconstrained invariant mass (left) and fit confidence level (right) for '''pi0''' candidates after the mass-constrained kinematic fit. Candidates with Chi2 < 3(5) are shown in red (blue). These are from decays of a2(1320)to eta-pi0 to 4 gamma generated in genr8. This can be compared with Figure 5.12 in [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/gluex/DocDB/0009/000989/001/simulation.pdf Calorimeter physics simulations and reconstruction for the Calorimetry Review (GlueX Portal)]
[http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/gluex/DocDB/0009/000989/001/simulation.pdf Calorimeter physics simulations and reconstruction for the Calorimetry Review (GlueX Portal)]
+
  
 
[[Image:Figure512.png]]
 
[[Image:Figure512.png]]
Line 21: Line 20:
  
  
* Unconstrained invariant mass (left) and fit confidence level (right) for '''eta''' candidates after the mass-constrained kinematic fit. Candidates with Chi2 < 3(5) are shown in red (blue). This can be compared with Figure 5.13 in  
+
* Unconstrained invariant mass (left) and fit confidence level (right) for '''eta''' candidates after the mass-constrained kinematic fit. Candidates with Chi2 < 3(5) are shown in red (blue). These are from decays of a2(1320)to eta-pi0 to 4 gamma generated in genr8.This can be compared with Figure 5.13 in [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/gluex/DocDB/0009/000989/001/simulation.pdf Calorimeter physics simulations and reconstruction for the Calorimetry Review (GlueX Portal)]
[http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/gluex/DocDB/0009/000989/001/simulation.pdf Calorimeter physics simulations and reconstruction for the Calorimetry Review (GlueX Portal)]
+
  
 
[[Image:Figure513.png]]
 
[[Image:Figure513.png]]

Revision as of 11:52, 17 February 2009

  • Reconstructed Z minus generated Z over the length of the module. The deviations are less than 0.5 cm.

MeanrecZ minus genZ.png


  • Reconstructed photon energy BEFORE corrections

RecEgenE vs recZ.png RecEgenE vs recZ mean.png


  • Reconstructed photon energy AFTER corrections

EPhogenE vs recZ.png EPhogenE vs recZ mean.png


Figure512.png


Figure513.png