Difference between revisions of "February 17, 2009 Physics"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| − | * Reconstructed single photon energy '''BEFORE corrections''' | + | * Reconstructed single photon (0 to 4 GeV) energy '''BEFORE corrections''' |
[[Image:RecEgenE vs recZ.png|400px]] [[Image:RecEgenE vs recZ mean.png|400px]] | [[Image:RecEgenE vs recZ.png|400px]] [[Image:RecEgenE vs recZ mean.png|400px]] | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| − | * Reconstructed single photon energy '''AFTER corrections''' | + | * Reconstructed single photon (0 to 4 GeV) energy '''AFTER corrections''' |
[[Image:EPhogenE vs recZ.png|400px]] [[Image:EPhogenE vs recZ mean.png|400px]] | [[Image:EPhogenE vs recZ.png|400px]] [[Image:EPhogenE vs recZ mean.png|400px]] | ||
Revision as of 11:53, 17 February 2009
- Reconstructed Z minus generated Z over the length of the module. The deviations are less than 0.5 cm.
- Reconstructed single photon (0 to 4 GeV) energy BEFORE corrections
- Reconstructed single photon (0 to 4 GeV) energy AFTER corrections
- Unconstrained invariant mass (left) and fit confidence level (right) for pi0 candidates after the mass-constrained kinematic fit. Candidates with Chi2 < 3(5) are shown in red (blue). These are from decays of a2(1320)to eta-pi0 to 4 gamma generated in genr8. This can be compared with Figure 5.12 in Calorimeter physics simulations and reconstruction for the Calorimetry Review (GlueX Portal)
- Unconstrained invariant mass (left) and fit confidence level (right) for eta candidates after the mass-constrained kinematic fit. Candidates with Chi2 < 3(5) are shown in red (blue). These are from decays of a2(1320)to eta-pi0 to 4 gamma generated in genr8.This can be compared with Figure 5.13 in Calorimeter physics simulations and reconstruction for the Calorimetry Review (GlueX Portal)
