Difference between revisions of "JLab discusion on tracking priorities, March 5, 2009"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
#Short summary of current effort (~5 slides each)
 
#Short summary of current effort (~5 slides each)
 
#* David
 
#* David
#* Simon
+
#* [http://www.jlab.org/~staylor/kalman030409.pdf] Simon
 
#* Mark
 
#* Mark
 
#Issues impacting design/construction
 
#Issues impacting design/construction

Revision as of 09:05, 5 March 2009

General comment: We have three tracking efforts. How can we leverage the work to date? How do we move forward effectively?

  1. Short summary of current effort (~5 slides each)
    • David
    • [1] Simon
    • Mark
  2. Issues impacting design/construction
    • sensitivity to B-field
    • wire configuration for FDCs
    • assignment of HV groups to wires (i.e. failure modes)
    • Effective size of forward hole (nominally 1 deg)
    • finalizing CDC geometry
    • Decision regarding charge division in CDC
    • ...we need to complete this list
  3. Achieving a robust tracking program for single tracks (multiple scattering, energy loss and position resolution only)
    • Not necessarily the "final" or best resolution
    • High efficiency over all angles (~1-140, define definite boundaries in angle and momentum)
    • Efficiency defined based on a reasonable cut on tracking Chi2.
    • Studies must include transition between CDC and FDC.
    • Goal: create efficiency and momentum resolution plots on log scales (p vs theta) for pions and protons.
  4. Studies of multi-track events
    • Are there any developments here beyond improvements/refinement of 2.? as a function of events with multiple tracks?
    • constraining the vertex?
  5. Refinements/optimizations of the tracking code
    • Kalman filters
    • reference trajectory methods
    • ... work on these to the extent that they impact studies 1-3.