Difference between revisions of "July 26, 2019 FCAL Insert Design Meeting"
From GlueXWiki
(→Agenda) |
|||
| (14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
* Discuss 40x40 vs 32x32 crystal assembly | * Discuss 40x40 vs 32x32 crystal assembly | ||
| − | ** 32x32 crystal matrix layout [[Media:32x32_crystal_matrix_2D_layout]] | + | ** 32x32 crystal matrix layout [[Media:32x32_crystal_matrix_2D_layout.pdf]] |
| − | * | + | ** 40x40 crystal matrix layout [[Media:40x40_crystal_matrix_2D_layout.pdf]] |
| − | * | + | ** Decision to pre-measure stacks of crystals and the existing FCAL to determine bottom row offsets |
| − | * | + | ** Shimming of row above crystals may be needed |
| − | + | * Discuss installing Rohacel US of crystals to fill hole and support the lead glass blocks | |
| − | + | ** Rohacel properties [[Media:Rohacel cut sheet.pdf]] | |
| − | * | + | ** Radiation Hardness https://p25ext.lanl.gov/phenix/mvd/notes/1997/PHENIX-MVD-97-5/radiation.html |
| − | ** | + | ** http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/publish/bosze/phenixnote272/radiation.html (same data) |
| − | ** | + | * Discuss Tungsten absorber |
| − | * | + | ** How many crystals does it cover? |
| − | ** | + | ** How to support it and the blocks above |
| − | ** | + | * Monitoring System |
| − | * | + | ** Is acrylic sheet good enough for crystals? |
| − | * | + | * How were original FCAL lead glass modules stacked? |
| − | * | + | ** Matt Shepherd stated that they were rotated 90 degrees every other one and bottom row was shimmed as required. |
| − | * | + | ** What should the shim material be |
| + | * 3D Screenshots | ||
| + | ** Overall Iso View Sept 2018 [[Media:Iso.png]] | ||
| + | ** Cooling Iso View Sept 2018 [[Media:Cooling Iso.jpg]] | ||
| + | ** Cooling-compression Plate Iso View Sept 2018 [[Media:Cooling-compression Iso.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Decisions/Action items == | ||
| + | * We will go with the 40x40 matrix for the design, we will have to shim if the install changes to 32x32 | ||
| + | * Need to define rohacell | ||
| + | * Need to define monitoring system | ||
| + | * Need to define tungsten absorber geometry | ||
| + | * Need to perform heat load calcs | ||
| + | * Need to define cable management system | ||
| + | * Need to define shim material | ||
Latest revision as of 10:44, 30 July 2019
Meeting Time and Place
Friday July 26,2019 1pm At Jefferson Lab, room TED 2504
Agenda
- Discuss 40x40 vs 32x32 crystal assembly
- 32x32 crystal matrix layout Media:32x32_crystal_matrix_2D_layout.pdf
- 40x40 crystal matrix layout Media:40x40_crystal_matrix_2D_layout.pdf
- Decision to pre-measure stacks of crystals and the existing FCAL to determine bottom row offsets
- Shimming of row above crystals may be needed
- Discuss installing Rohacel US of crystals to fill hole and support the lead glass blocks
- Rohacel properties Media:Rohacel cut sheet.pdf
- Radiation Hardness https://p25ext.lanl.gov/phenix/mvd/notes/1997/PHENIX-MVD-97-5/radiation.html
- http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/publish/bosze/phenixnote272/radiation.html (same data)
- Discuss Tungsten absorber
- How many crystals does it cover?
- How to support it and the blocks above
- Monitoring System
- Is acrylic sheet good enough for crystals?
- How were original FCAL lead glass modules stacked?
- Matt Shepherd stated that they were rotated 90 degrees every other one and bottom row was shimmed as required.
- What should the shim material be
- 3D Screenshots
- Overall Iso View Sept 2018 Media:Iso.png
- Cooling Iso View Sept 2018 Media:Cooling Iso.jpg
- Cooling-compression Plate Iso View Sept 2018 Media:Cooling-compression Iso.jpg
Decisions/Action items
- We will go with the 40x40 matrix for the design, we will have to shim if the install changes to 32x32
- Need to define rohacell
- Need to define monitoring system
- Need to define tungsten absorber geometry
- Need to perform heat load calcs
- Need to define cable management system
- Need to define shim material
