Difference between revisions of "July 26, 2019 FCAL Insert Design Meeting"
From GlueXWiki
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
** Is acrylic sheet good enough for crystals? | ** Is acrylic sheet good enough for crystals? | ||
* How were original FCAL lead glass modules stacked? | * How were original FCAL lead glass modules stacked? | ||
| − | ** Matt | + | ** Matt Shepherd stated that they were rotated 90 degrees every other one and bottom row was shimmed as required. |
Revision as of 12:39, 29 July 2019
Meeting Time and Place
Friday July 26,2019 1pm At Jefferson Lab, room TED 2504
Agenda
- Discuss 40x40 vs 32x32 crystal assembly
- 32x32 crystal matrix layout Media:32x32_crystal_matrix_2D_layout.pdf
- 40x40 crystal matrix layout Media:40x40_crystal_matrix_2D_layout.pdf
- Discuss installing Rohacel US of crystals to fill hole and support the lead glass blocks
- Rohacel properties Media:Rohacel cut sheet.pdf
- Discuss Tungsten absorber
- How many crystals does it cover?
- How to support it and the blocks above
- Monitoring System
- Is acrylic sheet good enough for crystals?
- How were original FCAL lead glass modules stacked?
- Matt Shepherd stated that they were rotated 90 degrees every other one and bottom row was shimmed as required.
