Difference between revisions of "March 11-18"
From GlueXWiki
(Created page with "==Monday, March 11== * Drew/Josh will take a look at the FCAL channels Ilya pointed out with suspicious gains (https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3665439). If voltages can be in...") |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Drew/Josh will take a look at the FCAL channels Ilya pointed out with suspicious gains (https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3665439). If voltages can be increased for those channels with high gain factors we will try to adjust them accordingly. | * Drew/Josh will take a look at the FCAL channels Ilya pointed out with suspicious gains (https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3665439). If voltages can be increased for those channels with high gain factors we will try to adjust them accordingly. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Tuesday, March 12== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * We will need to coordinate TAC run with empty target runs and Hall-C downtime (this Sunday morning) | ||
| + | * Distributions need to make: | ||
| + | ** Number of accidentals in tagger for window around +/- 1 GeV | ||
| + | ** Accidentals in CCAL for monitoring compton | ||
| + | * Should add FCAL inv mass monitoring plots to online monitoring routine | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Wednesday, March 13== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Liping's simulation verifying that the shift we see in the CCAL compton distribution is due to the 6 mm shift of FCAL: https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3667347 | ||
| + | * One thing we'll need to consider is how to handle the inconsistent channels in the FCAL. Some channels are known to drop in HV and recover on their own | ||
Latest revision as of 17:36, 13 March 2019
Monday, March 11
- Drew/Josh will take a look at the FCAL channels Ilya pointed out with suspicious gains (https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3665439). If voltages can be increased for those channels with high gain factors we will try to adjust them accordingly.
Tuesday, March 12
- We will need to coordinate TAC run with empty target runs and Hall-C downtime (this Sunday morning)
- Distributions need to make:
- Number of accidentals in tagger for window around +/- 1 GeV
- Accidentals in CCAL for monitoring compton
- Should add FCAL inv mass monitoring plots to online monitoring routine
Wednesday, March 13
- Liping's simulation verifying that the shift we see in the CCAL compton distribution is due to the 6 mm shift of FCAL: https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3667347
- One thing we'll need to consider is how to handle the inconsistent channels in the FCAL. Some channels are known to drop in HV and recover on their own
