Difference between revisions of "Mattione Update 05162012"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(π- Resolution Comparison)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* Track Reconstruction Resolution Comparison (Candidate vs. Time-Based): Theta = 90 - 95, P = 110, 150, 210
 
* Track Reconstruction Resolution Comparison (Candidate vs. Time-Based): Theta = 90 - 95, P = 110, 150, 210
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px]]
+
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%]]
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px]]
+
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%]]
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px]]
+
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%]]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_150MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px]]
+
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_150MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 61%]]
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_150MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px]]
+
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_150MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 61%]]
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_150MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px]]
+
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_150MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 61%]]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px]]
+
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%]]
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px]]
+
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%]]
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px]]
+
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%]]
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 13:39, 16 May 2012

π- Resolution Efficiency

  • # Reconstructed Tracks / Event:
    • NOTE: Hit selectors disabled for wire based & time based fits, except for "SVN Code": instead use hits from track candidates (and ignore hits after spiral turn back inwards)
Track Candidates
Wire Based Tracks
Time Based Tracks

π- Resolution Comparison

  • Track Reconstruction Resolution Comparison (Candidate vs. Time-Based): Theta = 90 - 95, P = 110, 150, 210
Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%
Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%
Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%
Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 61%
Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 61%
Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 61%
Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%
Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%
Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%