Difference between revisions of "Mattione Update 05162012"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎π- Resolution Comparison)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
== π- Resolution Efficiency ==
+
== π- Reconstruction Efficiency ==
−
* # Reconstructed Tracks / Event:
+
* # Reconstructed Tracks / Event (for time & wire based, can include "proton" guesses (tried to disable)):
−
** NOTE: Hit selectors disabled for wire based & time based fits, except for "SVN Code": instead use hits from track candidates (and ignore hits after spiral turn back inwards)
+
** NOTE: Hit selectors disabled for wire based & time based fits
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_SlowPiPlus_NumCandidates.gif|thumb|left|350px|Track Candidates]]
 
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_SlowPiPlus_NumCandidates.gif|thumb|left|350px|Track Candidates]]
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
== π- Resolution Comparison ==
 
== π- Resolution Comparison ==
−
* Track Reconstruction Resolution Comparison (Candidate vs. Time-Based): Theta = 90 - 95, P = 110, 150, 210
+
=== 90 Degrees ===
 +
* Track Reconstruction Resolution Comparison (Candidate vs. Time-Based): P = 110, 150, 210 (rows), delta-p, theta, phi (columns)
 +
** NOTE: Plots require closest reconstructed track to be of correct PID (PID: mass set during kalman filter)
 +
** NOTE: Ignore the offset in the track-candidate delta-phi distribution
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%]]
 
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%]]
Line 22: Line 25:
 
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%]]
 
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%]]
 
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%]]
 
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV90Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%]]
 +
|}
 +
 +
=== 60 Degrees ===
 +
* Track Reconstruction Resolution Comparison (Candidate vs. Time-Based): P = 110, 150, 210 (rows), delta-p, theta, phi (columns)
 +
** NOTE: Plots require closest reconstructed track to be of correct PID (PID: mass set during kalman filter)
 +
** NOTE: Ignore the offset in the track-candidate delta-phi distribution
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV60Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 92%, Time-based: 38%]]
 +
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV60Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 92%, Time-based: 38%]]
 +
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_110MeV60Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 92%, Time-based: 38%]]
 +
|-
 +
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_150MeV60Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 34%]]
 +
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_150MeV60Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 34%]]
 +
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_150MeV60Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 34%]]
 +
|-
 +
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV60Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 97%, Time-based: 80%]]
 +
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaThetaComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV60Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 97%, Time-based: 80%]]
 +
| [[Image:Mattione_Update_05162012_DeltaPhiComparison_PiPlus_SpiralCode_210MeV60Deg.gif|thumb|left|350px|Candidates: 97%, Time-based: 80%]]
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 14:05, 16 May 2012

π- Reconstruction Efficiency

  • # Reconstructed Tracks / Event (for time & wire based, can include "proton" guesses (tried to disable)):
    • NOTE: Hit selectors disabled for wire based & time based fits
Track Candidates
Wire Based Tracks
Time Based Tracks

π- Resolution Comparison

90 Degrees

  • Track Reconstruction Resolution Comparison (Candidate vs. Time-Based): P = 110, 150, 210 (rows), delta-p, theta, phi (columns)
    • NOTE: Plots require closest reconstructed track to be of correct PID (PID: mass set during kalman filter)
    • NOTE: Ignore the offset in the track-candidate delta-phi distribution
Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%
Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%
Candidates: 93%, Time-based: 54%
Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 61%
Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 61%
Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 61%
Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%
Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%
Candidates: 98%, Time-based: 91%

60 Degrees

  • Track Reconstruction Resolution Comparison (Candidate vs. Time-Based): P = 110, 150, 210 (rows), delta-p, theta, phi (columns)
    • NOTE: Plots require closest reconstructed track to be of correct PID (PID: mass set during kalman filter)
    • NOTE: Ignore the offset in the track-candidate delta-phi distribution
Candidates: 92%, Time-based: 38%
Candidates: 92%, Time-based: 38%
Candidates: 92%, Time-based: 38%
Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 34%
Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 34%
Candidates: 95%, Time-based: 34%
Candidates: 97%, Time-based: 80%
Candidates: 97%, Time-based: 80%
Candidates: 97%, Time-based: 80%
Retrieved from "https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Mattione_Update_05162012&oldid=37167"