Mattione Update 10312011

From GlueXWiki
Revision as of 15:19, 2 November 2011 by Pmatt (Talk | contribs) (BCAL π- BCAL σt 334 vs 1234 Segmentation)

Jump to: navigation, search

Procedure

  • Reconstruct π(1600) -> b1π events with t-slope = 2.0 (was 5.0 for X(2000)) using both the 334 and 1234 segmentations
  • Plot Δβ vs p for π+ candidates to see proton, π+ separation.

1234 Segmentation BCAL Time-Smear Details

  • The 1234 segmentation is not available in the HDGEANT simulation, so its BCAL shower time was smeared manually during reconstruction
    • The BCAL hit-time smear was disabled in mc_smear
  • The shower time was smeared by: σsmear = sqrt(σ2t_1234_Target - σ2t_334_NoSmear), where σt_1234_Target = σt_334*Improvement_Ratio, Improvement_Ratio = σt_1234 / σt_334
    • These time uncertainties were studied as a function of dE and θ
    • The σt_1234 / σt_334 improvement ratio was obtained from fitting the results of David Lawrence's studies of photons
    • The σ2t_334 and σ2t_334_NoSmear variances were determined separately for protons and pions, by comparing the reconstructed shower times to their true values.

Improvements from last week's study

  • Looking at π(1600) -> b1π events with t-slope = 2.0 instead of π(2000) -> b1π events with t-slope = 5.0: Higher proton momentum in BCAL for studying separation
  • The σt_334_NoSmear resolution is no longer assumed to be zero: it is non-negligible in the region of the FDC support structure at for large energy deposits (determined separately for protons and pions)
  • The σt_334 resolution is determined separately for protons and pions (was using the pion resolution for both previously)
  • Better fit to photon σt_1234 / σt_334 distributions due to extra data point at 50 degrees
  • Low-θ, low-dE time resolutions better-simulated: instead of extrapolating fit, performing linear-interpolation between data-points.
  • 2 (presumably canceling) bug fixes, final results on hold until confirmation (tomorrow possibly?).

NOTES

  • The photon σt_1234 / σt_334 is assumed to be applicable to protons and pions

David's BCAL Photon Time Resolution Studies

  • γ BCAL σt vs. dE (GeV):
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPhotonTimeResolution Theta12Degrees.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPhotonTimeResolution Theta16Degrees.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPhotonTimeResolution Theta20Degrees.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPhotonTimeResolution Theta50Degrees.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPhotonTimeResolution Theta90Degrees.gif


Time Resolution Segmentation Ratio

  • γ BCAL σt_1234 / σt_334 vs. dE (GeV):
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio.gif


  • Fits to γ BCAL σt_1234 / σt_334 vs. θ in dE bins:
  • Don't trust fits at low-θ, so linearly-interpolate between 12 and 16 degrees.
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio Fits1.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio Fits2.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPhotonTimeResolutionRatio Fits3.gif


Summary of BCAL π- & proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits

  • When the BCAL time-smear is enabled, the π- & proton time resolutions are similar.
  • When the BCAL time-smear is enabled, the π- & proton time resolutions are similar, except at high shower energies.

BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits

  • BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits vs. θ in dE bins:
    • NOTE: For the first dE bin, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
      • Last week, the fit was extrapolated from high-θ over the low-θ range.
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaT Fits1.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaT Fits2.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaT Fits3.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaT Fits4.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaT Fits5.gif


BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits with BCAL Time Smear Disabled

  • BCAL π- 334 Segmentation σt Fits with BCAL Time Smear Disabled vs. θ in dE bins:
    • NOTE: These resolutions are negligible except at high dE.
    • NOTE: The bad fit results were ignored.
    • NOTE: For the first two dE bins, the time smear was set to zero.
    • NOTE: For the third and forth dE bins, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear Fits1.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear Fits2.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear Fits3.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear Fits4.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALPiMinusSigmaTNoTSmear Fits5.gif



BCAL Proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits

  • BCAL proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits vs. θ in dE bins:
    • NOTE: For the first dE bin, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
      • Last week, the π- fit was used, and was extrapolated from high-θ over the low-θ range.
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaT Fits1.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaT Fits2.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaT Fits3.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaT Fits4.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaT Fits5.gif


BCAL Proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits with BCAL Time Smear Disabled

  • BCAL proton 334 Segmentation σt Fits vs. θ in dE bins:
    • NOTE: These resolutions are negligible except at high dE.
    • NOTE: The bad fit results were ignored.
    • NOTE: For the first dE bin, the values were linearly interpolated between the points instead of fit to a function.
    • NOTE: For the second dE bin, for θ <= 27.0, the values were linearly interpolated between the points. For θ > 27.0, the time resolution was set to zero.
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear Fits1.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear Fits2.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear Fits3.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear Fits4.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTNoTSmear Fits5.gif


BCAL Proton BCAL σt 334 vs 1234 Segmentation

  • BCAL proton σt vs. θ in dE bins, 334 vs 1234 Segmentation:
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTCompare Bin1.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTCompare Bin2.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTCompare Bin3.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTCompare Bin4.gif
Mattione Update 10312011 BCALProtonSigmaTCompare Bin5.gif


π(1600) -> b1pi Events, π+ BCAL Δβ vs p

Δβ = βp - βt = p/sqrt(p*p + m*m) - path/(c*TOF)

  • π(1600) -> b1pi Events, π+ BCAL Δβ vs p:
  • NOTE: Resolution improvement is worse than last week due to a bug in the previous iteration.
334 Segmentation
1234 Segmentation
  • π(1600) -> b1pi Events, π+ Candidates, BCAL Δβ vs p
p = 1.2 GeV/c, 334 Segmentation
p = 1.2 GeV/c, 1234 Segmentation
p = 1.4 GeV/c, 334 Segmentation
p = 1.4 GeV/c, 1234 Segmentation
p = 1.5 GeV/c, 334 Segmentation
p = 1.5 GeV/c, 1234 Segmentation
p = 1.6 GeV/c, 334 Segmentation
p = 1.6 GeV/c, 1234 Segmentation