Difference between revisions of "May 29, 2007 Calorimetry"
From GlueXWiki
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Present: Simon, David, Eugene, Elke, Elton, Richard, Alex, Zisis, Blake, George | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Alex began by presenting results from his analysis of shower depth in the BCAL. | ||
| + | ** He showed fractional energy deposited in a layer as a function of incident beam energy as described in BCAL_res_cal.pdf above. He then took the integrated parametrization for longitudinal energy deposition in the PDG and adjusted the BCAL calibration to match. It should be noted that the PDG parametrization is derived from data > 1 GeV. The gross features match, but there are clear discrepancies for incident photons below 300 MeV. | ||
Revision as of 15:52, 29 May 2007
Agenda
May 29, 2007, Calorimetry meeting, 1:00 PM EDT
- Report from Alex on Beam Test Analysis
- Status report on incorporating sampling fraction error into MC
- Regina Standalone Monte Carlo (ReSAM) and Time Resolution update by Blake
Low Energy ReSAM
Time Difference Resolution
Time Average Resolution
- AOB
Dial-In Information
Minutes
Present: Simon, David, Eugene, Elke, Elton, Richard, Alex, Zisis, Blake, George
- Alex began by presenting results from his analysis of shower depth in the BCAL.
- He showed fractional energy deposited in a layer as a function of incident beam energy as described in BCAL_res_cal.pdf above. He then took the integrated parametrization for longitudinal energy deposition in the PDG and adjusted the BCAL calibration to match. It should be noted that the PDG parametrization is derived from data > 1 GeV. The gross features match, but there are clear discrepancies for incident photons below 300 MeV.
