Difference between revisions of "Minutes-2-24-2011"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 26: Line 26:
 
- We will have a readiness review in a month from now. Dave and Bill will work on the procedures/travelers/QA documents that are needed for the review. Beni will set up a page with the agenda, similar to that for the CDC review, where we will link all the documents. According to Eugene the review will be more technical than administrative.
 
- We will have a readiness review in a month from now. Dave and Bill will work on the procedures/travelers/QA documents that are needed for the review. Beni will set up a page with the agenda, similar to that for the CDC review, where we will link all the documents. According to Eugene the review will be more technical than administrative.
  
<!--
 
  
 
== Electronics ==
 
== Electronics ==
  
- Chris: 50 cables were reworked, but 13 of them came short by a foot. It turned out those are CDC type cables. Even if the length is not critical, we decided not to accept such cables for the FDC. Simon was concerned that we need a plan how to bundle, run the cables. Bill has some preliminary drawings, but everybody agrees that this is important.
+
- The answer from Allflex regarding the first article inspection is linked above. Bill suggested using better (printing) paper for packing. Roger will contact Allflex to coordinate the rate of the production. They will have to re-adjust their equipment every time they switch to the production of our cathodes. Most likely we will not be able to inspect the foils with the same rate. Therefore we will do only partial inspection during the acceptance and 100% inspection later whenever possible before the use of the foils. We may use summer students for this inspection.
  
- The rigid-flex will be produced as it was in the first article. We requested additional 140 flexes to be used for exercising and as spares in case of cathode foil failure. In total we will have 615 flexes.
+
-  
 +
 
 +
<!--
  
 
== Engineering ==
 
== Engineering ==

Revision as of 19:22, 24 February 2011

February 24, 2011 FDC meeting

Agenda

  1. Production (David)
    • Blue Crab status
    • Readiness review
  2. Electronics (Fernando, Roger)
  3. Engineering (Bill, David, Lubomir)
  4. Chamber testing
    • Tests with the middle chamber (Lubomir)
  5. Other

Minutes

Participants: Eugene, Bill, Dave, Roger, Simon, Beni, and Lubomir.

Production

- Dave: everything moved to Blue Crab (stringing table was moved there right after the meeting). We have there office with computers connected to network. Preparing for the PCB gluing. There was a problem with the lights there again. Bill regarding the stringing table: the pin rail was modified at the machine shop, ready together with the other parts to be mounted on the table at Blue Crab.

- We will have a readiness review in a month from now. Dave and Bill will work on the procedures/travelers/QA documents that are needed for the review. Beni will set up a page with the agenda, similar to that for the CDC review, where we will link all the documents. According to Eugene the review will be more technical than administrative.


Electronics

- The answer from Allflex regarding the first article inspection is linked above. Bill suggested using better (printing) paper for packing. Roger will contact Allflex to coordinate the rate of the production. They will have to re-adjust their equipment every time they switch to the production of our cathodes. Most likely we will not be able to inspect the foils with the same rate. Therefore we will do only partial inspection during the acceptance and 100% inspection later whenever possible before the use of the foils. We may use summer students for this inspection.

-