Difference between revisions of "Minutes-7-19-2012"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Test set-up at 126)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
= Agenda =
 
= Agenda =
# Production (Dave)
+
# Production [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/production/FDC_Construction_July_19_2012.xlsx Construction Tracking] (Dave)
 
#* Fourth package status and spare wire frames (Lubomir, Vlad)   
 
#* Fourth package status and spare wire frames (Lubomir, Vlad)   
 
#* Third package preparation
 
#* Third package preparation
#* Grounding (Vlad)
+
#* Grounding scheme (Vlad)
# Engineering (Bill)
+
# Engineering [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/drawings/spacer_ring_picture1.png], [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/drawings/schematic.png], [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/drawings/latest_chiller_view.png], [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/drawings/spacer_ring_cross_section.png], [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/drawings/spacer_ring_picture2.png] (Bill)
 
# Electronics (Chris, Nick)
 
# Electronics (Chris, Nick)
 
# Gas system (Beni, Bill)
 
# Gas system (Beni, Bill)
#* Gas mixture compilation
+
#* [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/general/PipeOutgassing.pdf Pipe outgassing], [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/general/AgingGasDet.pdf gas detector aiging]
 +
#* [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/general/GasCompilation.pdf Gas mixture] (Lubomir)
 
# Test set-up in 126 (Beni)
 
# Test set-up in 126 (Beni)
 
# Other
 
# Other
 
<!--
 
  
 
= Minutes =
 
= Minutes =
  
Participants: Bill, Dave, Eugene, Mark, Nick, Simon, Vlad, and Lubomir
+
Participants: Bill, Dave, Eugene, Nick, Chris, Simon, Beni, Vlad, and Lubomir
  
 
== Production ==
 
== Production ==
  
- Results of the tests of the last three cells of the fourth package: top cell #1 (wire frame #18) working fine, cell #2 (wire frame #28) and cell #3 (wire frame #27) had a problem, high dark currents, about 400-500nA for frame #28 and 1100-1300nA for #27. Both cells held HV for a long time (3-4 days) and all channels are OK.
+
- The wire frames that are not installed yet are listed in the Construction Tracking (page 1) linked above. We need two wire frames to finish package #4. Frame #2 is ok but has been deadened with 6cm diameter which is for the first two packages. #28 can be used, initially the dark current was higher but went down to 350nA. #3 could be the other candidate but the current increased after two days of testing, will continue with the tests over the weekend.
Still, we were not comfortable with that and disassembled the three cells on Monday. It turned out that the HV caps on all wire frames were indeed replaced, just Anatoly didn't have record for #28. We can't find what was different in the production of the last two wire frames. On Wednesday we installed back the third cell but with the working wire frame #18, that was before on the top.
+
  
- From Monday till Wednesday we were testing #27 separately between the two Lexan sheets: the high current didn't change even after cleaning, or removing HV cap on the HV PCBs. There's no current through the field HV and looks like the current goes on the HV PCBs to ground. Most likely humidity plays a role here. We used a lamp for several hours to heat/dry the PCB; the current goes up by a factor of two almost immediately after turning it on. On Wednesday we gave up with #27 and started testing wire frame #28, the current there is much lower, ~400nA. The plan is to try to clean it and if it's stable we will use it in the second cell. As for #27, the plan for now is to leave it as a spare and use one of the spare frames (#6) in the fourth package.
+
- All these chambers show elevated dark current, maybe due to the same reason. On one of them (#6), on one HV sector (#1)  we removed the current limiting resistors that connect the sense wires to the HV board: the dark current remain almost the same. We concluded that the current leakage is on the HV board, and more precisely on the positive HV trace. This trace has a section running on the back side which we suspect is causing the problem due to proximity to the Rohacell and the gold plated area on the back of the board. End of October 2011 we found that these traces are causing noise on the strips and we started coating them with conformal coating.  
  
- Spare wire frame #6: Anatoly was able to remove the HV caps and clean the Humiseal (without using aceton); there's die in the Humiseal which makes it very easy to see it with UV light. Next, we will test the wire frame between the Lexan sheets, first, without HV caps. Since we are not sure if we can fix #27, Bill will ask "Vision Machine" for quotation of four g10 wire frames. If we need them, we have to submit PR before the end of July.  
+
- Several options were considered: 1) put #28 and #3 in the fourth package and finish it, 2) try to fix two of the boards and use them in the fourth package, 3) wait for the spare parts and build four new wire frames and use two of them in the fourth package. So far we excluded option #1. Since 2) and 3) will take time we decided to close the fourth package with four cells, take it out of the installation fixture and put there the first package for refurbishment (we did all this right after the meeting).  
  
- Third package: 10 ground clips (first article) finally arrived and we tested them on the package. They have a bite of ~12.5mm and we asked for 11mm, that's why we have to bend them a little, but other than that they worked fine. Casey put already them on one cell and is looking for a way to bend them in a standard way, using a press. This is not a big deal and we decided to go ahead with the production of the rest of the clips, instead of waiting another month. Tina and Dave put the labels on all the pre-amps for the third package.  
+
- One way to fix the trace (Bill) is to cut the wire frame from the back in the Rohacell region ( Casey has done this once), another way (Dave) is to bypass the trace on the back side and make cable connection on the top. We decided to go with the later, but for that we have to mill a niche at the O-ring position for the wire and glue it there. Bill will work on the tooling to do this operation.
+
 
- We decided to try a new procedure for the installation of the cooling tubes, as proposed by Casey. Initially we don't put glue on the back brackets, just screw them loosely to the pre-amp brackets with the tube in between. After adjusting the tube position we tight the screws and then put glue on the back brackets from the sides. Mark suggested to tight the two ends of the tube together, before, on the first package, we left them loose.
+
- Third package: labels are put on the pre-amps and installed on the package. Vlad is working on the grounding positions. He marked the places for the grounding on several cells. At some places one ground strip will connect two or three cells. At one location per cell the grounding has to be split, at one place the big clip will be put and at another place, close to that, the other clip. Vlad is working on a measuring tool to record the angles of the grounding places to be used by the techs.
  
 
== Engineering update ==  
 
== Engineering update ==  
  
- Bill went through the 3D models of the cooling system attached above, explaining part by part both the water loop and the Fluorinert loop. He tries to find a way to detect early possible leakage. It was suggested to install a camera at the cooling system cart.  
+
- Bill submitted a PR for the four extra g10 wire frames. He got also an estimate for four thick (35mm) spacer rings (model drawings linked above), each $730, the only parts needed to proof the principle of the helium drift chamber. Since some engineering/drafting work is needed to submit the drawings, Eugene said we will do it later in the year when we start testing the spare package.   
 +
 
 +
- Bill once more explained the cooling system using the schematics and model drawing also link above. Answering Beni's question, Bill: we have an interlock system using the flow switches and RTDs through the slow control. In the heat exchanger the pressure of the water will be less than the pressure of the Fluorinert; if the latter leaks it will be detected looking at the level of the Fluorinert tank.
  
 
== Electronics update ==
 
== Electronics update ==
  
- Nick tested the LV distribution board, had to put 6.4V on the power supply to get at least 3V on the cards. Eugene had two remarks: one is that we double the power, will have the same heat on the LV cables as on the pre-amps. Bill: since only a quoter of the cables is inside the magnet, the cooling system will still be able to take the heat out of the detectors. Second Eugene's remark: we have four pre-amps on one cable and what if three of them fail, the current will be a factor of 4 lower, therefore the voltage on the last pre-amp will go up ~5.5V, is that OK for the voltage regulator?
+
- Chris: The contract for the four sets of PCBs was awarded to another company, Accurate Circuit Engineering, saving a lot of money. The delivery date is 08/02. Some concerns if the boards will be as good as those that we have.
 
+
- PR for the extra PCBs. Eugene: Fernando is aware of the problem with the sole source and that it has to be submitted by the end of the month. 
+
 
+
- Grounding: since we use copper foil on coper/gold we discussed if the copper oxidation will affect the grounding. Bill: according to Fernando copper oxide is conductive. Just in case there are problems we can solder the foil to the cathode/PCB surfaces.  
+
  
 
== Gas system update ==
 
== Gas system update ==
  
- There was a meeting on Wednesday, deciding to make budget estimates for the different options and see how it will fit in the budget. Two aspects directly related to FDC were discussed here:
+
- Beni about the organic gas and aging: everybody avoids using methane (CH4). Several mechanism resulting in the Molter effect, insulating deposits on the wires. Radiation tests (up to ~0.3 C/cm) of the CMS drift chambers using Ar/CO2/ethane: no degradation in the performance, but found some deposits on the wires. Both Hall A and Hall C use ethane in their gas mixtures bubbled through alcohol.
  
- The possibility to have a third gas in the mixture. We may need it in case our resolution is not good enough and we need to increase the gain (previous studies suggested the resolution improves with the gain). Then we may have some after-pulsing that can be suppressed with ternary gas mixture. Apart from the price Eugene said, first we want to make sure the use of organic gas doesn't result in aging. Lubomir: aging is proportional to the rates and as an example drift chambers with almost the same wires were used in the BigBite spectrometer in Hall A for many years at much higher rates. However, they used ethane, not isobutane. Bill: what if we pre-mix our gas somewhere else, what is the precision for the isobutane percentage? Lubomir will prepare a presentation on the gas mixtures for the next meeting.
+
- Bill asked if it is OK to use PET-G (material used for water bottles) pipes inside the magnet to lower the material (it has thin walls). Lubomir showed results from the CERN gas detector group studying the outgassing of different pipe materials; PET-G is not there. Eugene: we better use materials that are proven to be OK; polypropylene is the most likely choice.  
  
- Everybody agreed that we need to monitor the pressure of each individual cell using the gauge tubes. Bill: in case of some pressure difference between the cells we can use the same tubes to regulate the pressure in some extent.
+
- Lubomir on the advantages of using ethane or isobutane (same slides were discussed in the tracking meeting): if we need higher gains to improve the resolution, these gases offer that at much lower HV also suppressing after-pulses. Eugene: in Hall A the chambers (at BigBite) are very similar, sense and field wires with copper cathodes, they have been using ethane at much higher rates. Therefore, for the FDC it will be safe to use ethane, CDC has aluminum in the cathodes, so it's another story.
  
 
== Test set-up at 126 ==
 
== Test set-up at 126 ==
  
- According to Beni the DAQ is almost read, some problems with reading some of the modules, but the main problems have been solved.
+
- Beni about the DAQ: Bryan is working with Cody to fix the Linux libraries, some issues with the timing of the Linux ROCs and the fADC125. The problem is not in the Beni's code or CODA light.
 
+
-->
+

Latest revision as of 11:14, 20 July 2012

July 19, 2012 FDC meeting

Agenda

  1. Production Construction Tracking (Dave)
    • Fourth package status and spare wire frames (Lubomir, Vlad)
    • Third package preparation
    • Grounding scheme (Vlad)
  2. Engineering [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] (Bill)
  3. Electronics (Chris, Nick)
  4. Gas system (Beni, Bill)
  5. Test set-up in 126 (Beni)
  6. Other

Minutes

Participants: Bill, Dave, Eugene, Nick, Chris, Simon, Beni, Vlad, and Lubomir

Production

- The wire frames that are not installed yet are listed in the Construction Tracking (page 1) linked above. We need two wire frames to finish package #4. Frame #2 is ok but has been deadened with 6cm diameter which is for the first two packages. #28 can be used, initially the dark current was higher but went down to 350nA. #3 could be the other candidate but the current increased after two days of testing, will continue with the tests over the weekend.

- All these chambers show elevated dark current, maybe due to the same reason. On one of them (#6), on one HV sector (#1) we removed the current limiting resistors that connect the sense wires to the HV board: the dark current remain almost the same. We concluded that the current leakage is on the HV board, and more precisely on the positive HV trace. This trace has a section running on the back side which we suspect is causing the problem due to proximity to the Rohacell and the gold plated area on the back of the board. End of October 2011 we found that these traces are causing noise on the strips and we started coating them with conformal coating.

- Several options were considered: 1) put #28 and #3 in the fourth package and finish it, 2) try to fix two of the boards and use them in the fourth package, 3) wait for the spare parts and build four new wire frames and use two of them in the fourth package. So far we excluded option #1. Since 2) and 3) will take time we decided to close the fourth package with four cells, take it out of the installation fixture and put there the first package for refurbishment (we did all this right after the meeting).

- One way to fix the trace (Bill) is to cut the wire frame from the back in the Rohacell region ( Casey has done this once), another way (Dave) is to bypass the trace on the back side and make cable connection on the top. We decided to go with the later, but for that we have to mill a niche at the O-ring position for the wire and glue it there. Bill will work on the tooling to do this operation.

- Third package: labels are put on the pre-amps and installed on the package. Vlad is working on the grounding positions. He marked the places for the grounding on several cells. At some places one ground strip will connect two or three cells. At one location per cell the grounding has to be split, at one place the big clip will be put and at another place, close to that, the other clip. Vlad is working on a measuring tool to record the angles of the grounding places to be used by the techs.

Engineering update

- Bill submitted a PR for the four extra g10 wire frames. He got also an estimate for four thick (35mm) spacer rings (model drawings linked above), each $730, the only parts needed to proof the principle of the helium drift chamber. Since some engineering/drafting work is needed to submit the drawings, Eugene said we will do it later in the year when we start testing the spare package.

- Bill once more explained the cooling system using the schematics and model drawing also link above. Answering Beni's question, Bill: we have an interlock system using the flow switches and RTDs through the slow control. In the heat exchanger the pressure of the water will be less than the pressure of the Fluorinert; if the latter leaks it will be detected looking at the level of the Fluorinert tank.

Electronics update

- Chris: The contract for the four sets of PCBs was awarded to another company, Accurate Circuit Engineering, saving a lot of money. The delivery date is 08/02. Some concerns if the boards will be as good as those that we have.

Gas system update

- Beni about the organic gas and aging: everybody avoids using methane (CH4). Several mechanism resulting in the Molter effect, insulating deposits on the wires. Radiation tests (up to ~0.3 C/cm) of the CMS drift chambers using Ar/CO2/ethane: no degradation in the performance, but found some deposits on the wires. Both Hall A and Hall C use ethane in their gas mixtures bubbled through alcohol.

- Bill asked if it is OK to use PET-G (material used for water bottles) pipes inside the magnet to lower the material (it has thin walls). Lubomir showed results from the CERN gas detector group studying the outgassing of different pipe materials; PET-G is not there. Eugene: we better use materials that are proven to be OK; polypropylene is the most likely choice.

- Lubomir on the advantages of using ethane or isobutane (same slides were discussed in the tracking meeting): if we need higher gains to improve the resolution, these gases offer that at much lower HV also suppressing after-pulses. Eugene: in Hall A the chambers (at BigBite) are very similar, sense and field wires with copper cathodes, they have been using ethane at much higher rates. Therefore, for the FDC it will be safe to use ethane, CDC has aluminum in the cathodes, so it's another story.

Test set-up at 126

- Beni about the DAQ: Bryan is working with Cody to fix the Linux libraries, some issues with the timing of the Linux ROCs and the fADC125. The problem is not in the Beni's code or CODA light.