Difference between revisions of "Minutes-9-12-2013"
From GlueXWiki
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
- As indicated by Elton, after the BCAL was inserted in the magnet, it might be down w.r.t. the magnet axis by ~1/8". BCAL will be surveyed and then we will have the final numbers. However they will start the installation of the rails inside BCAL soon and we discussed how they should be aligned. For the FDC the most important is to be aligned w.r.t. the beam line. We have copper-free area of 12mm radius and insensitive area of 30mm, so 3mm is significant given the sharp rise of the background rates with the distance to the beam. | - As indicated by Elton, after the BCAL was inserted in the magnet, it might be down w.r.t. the magnet axis by ~1/8". BCAL will be surveyed and then we will have the final numbers. However they will start the installation of the rails inside BCAL soon and we discussed how they should be aligned. For the FDC the most important is to be aligned w.r.t. the beam line. We have copper-free area of 12mm radius and insensitive area of 30mm, so 3mm is significant given the sharp rise of the background rates with the distance to the beam. | ||
− | - According to Bill the nominal spacer between the BCAL plate and the rails is 3/16" thick (4.76mm) | + | - According to Bill the nominal spacer between the BCAL plate and the rails is 3/16" thick (4.76mm), which means one can still do adjustments of the rails if the BCAL offset is not more than 3mm. If it is more it will mean FDC will sit asymmetrically w.r.t. the top and bottom rails and the complication might be the installation/access of the connectors against the rails. |
== Engineering == | == Engineering == | ||
− | - | + | - Bill made the slot |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
== Electronics == | == Electronics == |
Revision as of 17:08, 12 September 2013
September 12, 2013 FDC meeting
Agenda
- Installation preparations [1] (all)
- Engineering (Bill)
- Electronics (Chris, Nick)
- Tests in EEL126 (Beni, Vlad, Lubomir)
- Other