Difference between revisions of "Minutes-9-30-2010"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
| − | Participants: Eugene, Fernando | + | Participants: Eugene, Fernando, Bill, David, Chris, Simon, Beni, Glenn, Gerard (on the phone), Roger, Mark, Casey, and Lubomir. |
| − | + | == Electronics == | |
| − | + | - Fernando: the last PCBs were shipped and will have them by Monday and then all will be sent for assembly (the contract is in place already). Chris checked all the boards | |
| + | visually, and three of them for continuity: only minor cosmetic problems. Gerard implemented the auto-load feature on fADC125. Bryan Moffit will put the new firmware | ||
| + | on the module so that we can use it for the next tests. Gerard fixed the third fADC125 and soon will have it ready to be sent to CMU. No news concerning the cathode | ||
| + | foils. | ||
| − | - | + | - Lubomir updated the document about the FDC electronics requirements, linked above, where you can find more details of the discussions listed below. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | - | + | - Pre-amps in discriminator mode: GlueX-doc-1364 states: "the discriminator has been optimize for operation |
| + | between 2-5fC and has a range of 20fC". While testing the discriminator cards with the full-scale prototype the lowest possible threshold was 10fC. With more chambers connected | ||
| + | and more noise we may need to increase the threshold up to 40-60fC. Fernando: the above numbers correspond to the high gain mode, in case of a low gain these numbers have to be | ||
| + | multiply by ~4. | ||
| − | - | + | - Quadratic vs linear interpolation in fADC125: if using fADC125 for drift time measurements, the quadratic interpolation gives a little advantage for 40ns peaking time. |
| − | + | If comparing the timing from the strips and wires (this helps to separate the real from the fake hits) the fADC resolution is of the order of 1ns. In this case the | |
| + | quadratic interpolation gives ~25% better resolution than the linear. | ||
| − | - | + | - fADC vs discriminator for the wires: Eugene asked if we have decided. According to the simulations the discriminator gives better position resolution for distances |
| + | smaller than 3-2mm where good timing resolution is needed | ||
- Gain of the cathode cards: present value of 2.6mV/fC will work for the FDC. To be safe we specify gain range of 2.0 - 3.2. The problem is that in the current pre-amp design, the next possible gain below 2.6 is 0.91. Lower gains might be needed if the cards generate with 2.6mV/fC. The final decision about the gain can can be made after building and testing | - Gain of the cathode cards: present value of 2.6mV/fC will work for the FDC. To be safe we specify gain range of 2.0 - 3.2. The problem is that in the current pre-amp design, the next possible gain below 2.6 is 0.91. Lower gains might be needed if the cards generate with 2.6mV/fC. The final decision about the gain can can be made after building and testing | ||
Revision as of 18:21, 30 September 2010
September 30, 2010 FDC meeting
Tentative Agenda
- Electronics
- Update (Fernando)
- Discussions of the FDC electronics (cont.) [FDC requirements]
- Engineering (Bill and David)
- Full-scale prototype
- tests with different gas mixtures (Beni)
- Other
![[1]](http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/WireStringing/stringingtable1.JPG){kind=link}
![[2]](http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/WireStringing/stringingtable2.JPG){kind=link}