Difference between revisions of "Minutes 061120"
From GlueXWiki
m (Text replacement - "/halldweb1.jlab.org/" to "/halldweb.jlab.org/") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
# [[Beam Test Run Plan]] | # [[Beam Test Run Plan]] | ||
# [[Run Table]] | # [[Run Table]] | ||
| − | # [https:// | + | # [https://halldweb.jlab.org/halldlog/ GlueX E-Log] |
# [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/software/RunInfoBCAL06 Online DAQ Database] | # [http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/software/RunInfoBCAL06 Online DAQ Database] | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
# ''Photon analysis:'' Blake. | # ''Photon analysis:'' Blake. | ||
# ''Cosmics analysis:'' Yianna. | # ''Cosmics analysis:'' Yianna. | ||
| − | # ''Electron analysis:'' Christine | + | # ''Electron analysis:'' Christine and Zisis. |
# ''Job submission:'' Blake and David. | # ''Job submission:'' Blake and David. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:01, 1 April 2015
Attendees: Alex (Indiana), Simon, David (JLab), Christine (Athens), George, Blake, Yianna, Zisis (Regina)
- Blake's Analysis: Blake walked us through his initial analysis on the ADC calibration using the MC. There's a hump at low values (~channel 200) in the individual cell spectra, adding up to a hump in the summed ADC (North and South). This is affecting the MeV/channel calibration. Cutting the hump improves the fits. The problem does not seem to be related to the pedestal subtraction. All these plots are from Run 2334 (our nominal run).
- Investigate the origin of the hump.
- Use timing information in this search (Blake).
- Add VETO to dst ROOT trees (David by end of week).
Useful Links
Action Items
- Pedestals, gain factors, calibration: Tagger/MC approach (Regina), Summed approach (Indiana).
- Photon analysis: Blake.
- Cosmics analysis: Yianna.
- Electron analysis: Christine and Zisis.
- Job submission: Blake and David.
