Difference between revisions of "Photographs of corrosion and surface defects"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|}
 
|}
  
Below are before and after photographs for one of the central 2 micron boards.  There is evidence for either oxidation of the copper or left-over photo-resist material present upon arrival of the boards from the manufacturer.
+
There are marks on one of the 5 micron center boards that from a distance look like fingerprints but actually turn out to be scuff/scratch marks:
  
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
 
|-
 
|-
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c2_02_closeup.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 2a: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 09/08.]]
+
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c5_02_closeup.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 2a: Photograph of 5micron/Center#2 flaws taken 09/08.]]
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c2_02_closeup_new.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 2b: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 03/09.]]
+
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c5_02_closeup_new.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 2b: Photograph of 5micron/Center#2 flaws taken 03/09.]]
 +
|-
 +
 
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Below are before and after photographs for one of the central 2 micron boards.  There is evidence for either oxidation of the copper or left-over photo-resist material present upon arrival of the boards from the manufacturer.  Again, it does not appear that these flaws got worse over time.
 +
 
 +
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
 +
|-
 +
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c2_02_closeup.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 4a: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 09/08.]]
 +
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c2_02_closeup_new.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 4b: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 03/09.]]
 
|-
 
|-
  
Line 23: Line 35:
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
 
|-
 
|-
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c2_02_closeup2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 3a: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 09/08.]]
+
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c2_02_closeup2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 5a: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 09/08.]]
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c2_02_closeup2_new.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 3b: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 03/09.]]
+
|width="515pt"|[[Image:c2_02_closeup2_new.jpg|thumb|none|500px|figure 5b: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 03/09.]]
 
|-
 
|-
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 17:35, 27 March 2009

Photographs of flaws in the Allflex films were taken when the boards arrived in September '08 and again in March '09 after being stored in a dry Nitrogen environment. The first two photographs below show that there was already evidence for corrosion or poor quality of the copper surface on one of the 5 micron boards when they arrived from the manufacturer, but it is not clear that this problem became worse over time.

figure 1a: Photograph of 5micron/Left#2 flaw taken 09/08.
figure 1b: Photograph of 5micron/Left#2 flaw taken 03/09.

There are marks on one of the 5 micron center boards that from a distance look like fingerprints but actually turn out to be scuff/scratch marks:

figure 2a: Photograph of 5micron/Center#2 flaws taken 09/08.
figure 2b: Photograph of 5micron/Center#2 flaws taken 03/09.


Below are before and after photographs for one of the central 2 micron boards. There is evidence for either oxidation of the copper or left-over photo-resist material present upon arrival of the boards from the manufacturer. Again, it does not appear that these flaws got worse over time.

figure 4a: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 09/08.
figure 4b: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 03/09.
figure 5a: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 09/08.
figure 5b: Photograph of 2micron/Center#2 flaws taken 03/09.