Difference between revisions of "Polarimeter 11 01 2010"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Simulations)
Line 39: Line 39:
 
* Some sort of detector made of silicon, 300μm thick. Consists of two pieces, left and right, for positrons and electrons.
 
* Some sort of detector made of silicon, 300μm thick. Consists of two pieces, left and right, for positrons and electrons.
 
* The positions of the hit e<sup>+</sup> or e<sup>-</sup> hits  are calculated as the energy-weighed average of individually hits within certain window.
 
* The positions of the hit e<sup>+</sup> or e<sup>-</sup> hits  are calculated as the energy-weighed average of individually hits within certain window.
 +
 +
<br/>
 +
 +
[[Image:polarimeter_11_01_2010.gif|left|thumb|400px|A layout of the detector and the beamline for this simulations.  ]]
 +
 +
<br/ clear="all">
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
 +
[[Image:pairSym_20K_optim_1_2.lund.evio.gif|left|thumb|700px|Positions of the hits on the detector. From left to right from top to bottom:
 +
Directional cosines C<sub>y</sub> vs C<sub>x</sub> of the original electrons and positrons, the locations of the hits on the face of the detector Y vs X, zoom-in for the electron  Y vs X,  zoom-in for the positron  Y vs X.]]
 +
 +
<br/ clear="all">

Revision as of 09:44, 1 November 2010

Preliminary evaluation of the options for polarimetry with nuclear pair production

References

Considered Options

  1. Put a an e+e- detector in the beamline before the PS magnet allowing for ~2.5 m lever arm.
Pros
  • No magnetic field distortions.
Cons
  • Short lever arm.
  • Detector is exposed to the photon beam.
  1. Put a an e+e- detector in the beamline after the PS magnet allowing for ~4.5 m lever arm, no B-field.
Pros
  • Relatively longer lever arm.
Cons
  • Detector is exposed to the photon beam.
  • Small distortion effects due to incomplete degaussing of the PS magnet.
  1. Put separate e+ and e- detectors off the beamline after the PS magnet allowing for ~4.5 m lever arm, small \int Bdl\sim 0.12 T m.
Pros
  • Relatively longer lever arm.
  • Detector not exposed to the beam
Cons
  • Magnetic field mixes different momenta and angles at the same position of the detector.
  • Distortion due to the fringe fields.

Simulations

  • Use GEANT4 based program to simulate the basic features. The geometry may have conflicts with the current Hall D beamline configuration.
  • Symmetric Pairs are simulated with P_{{z}}=4 GeV, and \theta =6\times 10^{{-5}} rad.
  • All pairs pass through a converter which is 6μm thick, positioned at z=0.
  • 0.3 T constant dipole magnetic field in vertical direction starting at z=2.3 m with the magnetic length of 40 cm
  • Vacuum window 100μm at z=4.45 m (5cm before the detector)
  • Some sort of detector made of silicon, 300μm thick. Consists of two pieces, left and right, for positrons and electrons.
  • The positions of the hit e+ or e- hits are calculated as the energy-weighed average of individually hits within certain window.


A layout of the detector and the beamline for this simulations.




Positions of the hits on the detector. From left to right from top to bottom: Directional cosines Cy vs Cx of the original electrons and positrons, the locations of the hits on the face of the detector Y vs X, zoom-in for the electron Y vs X, zoom-in for the positron Y vs X.