Difference between revisions of "Resolution studies"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 45: Line 45:
 
[[Image:Pi0eta invmass.png]]
 
[[Image:Pi0eta invmass.png]]
  
The smaller peaks in the 3x3 geometry seem to indicate a lower efficiency for reconstruction compared to the 6x4 inner geometry.
+
The smaller peaks in the 3x3 geometry seem to indicate a lower efficiency for reconstruction compared to the 6x4 inner geometry which seems to shift the peak to a higher value.
  
 
[[Image:Pi0eta invmass 6x4fit.png]]
 
[[Image:Pi0eta invmass 6x4fit.png]]
 +
 +
The fit is to the 6x4 geometry spectra.

Revision as of 12:10, 24 November 2008

Production:

Pi0's and etas are simulated in the GlueX detector using the full HDGeant simulation that is currently (November 2008) in the SVN repository. The isobar resonance decay X(1700) is simulated using genr8 which produces the kinematics of the resonance decay and the subsequent pi0 and eta decays to photons. The 4-momenta of the decays are then used as inputs into the HDGeant simulation. HDGeant simulates the energy depostion and postion of the decay photons within the GlueX detector. The output of HDGeant is then analysed to reconstruct the pi0s and etas.

genr8 Input Card:

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Start Input Values %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % beamp.x beamp.y beamp.z beamMass 0 0 9 0 % targetp.x targetp.y targetp.z targetMass 0 0 0 0.938 % t-channelSlope

       5.0                                                           

% number of particles needed to describe the isobar decay of X 8 % % particle# 0&1 are always the X&Y %part# chld1# chld2# parent# Id nchild mass width charge f lag % baryon (Y) decay

0       *      *       *       14      0      0.938   0      +1       11
                                                                       

% meson (X) decay

1       2      3       *       0       2      1.7     0.3     0     00 
2       4      5       1       17      2      0.540   0       0     01 
3       6      7       1       7       2      0.135   0       0     01 
4       *      *       2       1       0      0.0     0       0     11 
5       *      *       2       1       0      0.0     0       0     11
6       *      *       3       1       0      0.0     0       0     11
7       *      *       3       1       0      0.0     0       0     11

!EOI %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End Input Values %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % for narrow widths particles(stable to strong interactions) % set width to zero (i.e. eta, pi's). % %flag 00 =isobar or resonace %flag 01 = production particle that decays i.e. eta, pizero .. %flag 11 = production particle that does not decay i.e. piplus,... %flag 10 = final state particle not in production i.e. gamma


What this then produces is #gamma p -> X(1700) p -> eta pi0 p -> 4#gamma p. The analysis code is meant to reconstruct the pi0s and etas from the decay photons in the BCAL and FCAL calorimeters.

2-photons invariant mass. No cuts: Pi0eta invmass.png

The smaller peaks in the 3x3 geometry seem to indicate a lower efficiency for reconstruction compared to the 6x4 inner geometry which seems to shift the peak to a higher value.

Pi0eta invmass 6x4fit.png

The fit is to the 6x4 geometry spectra.