Difference between revisions of "RunPeriod-2018-01 Validation"
From GlueXWiki
(→2018 runs) |
(→2018 runs) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3513952 | * https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3513952 | ||
* https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3513973 | * https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3513973 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Production-is runs ? ''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | These runs are maybe OK. Let's see... | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Diamond: 40881, 40883, 40893, 40894, 40895, 40896, 40898, 40902 [note 40892 looks bad?] | ||
| + | * AMO: 40884, 40885, | ||
| + | * Empty target: 40903 | ||
Revision as of 15:58, 16 January 2018
December runs
- compressed mode: 40660, 40661, 40662, [maybe: 40686], 40701
- long mode: 40659
2018 runs
Calibration runs
These are production runs taken early on. Detector conditions were changing, esp. for the TAGM, so I am not going to mark them as "physics quality"
- AMO long mode: 40785, 40786, 40787
- AMO compressed mode: 40788, 40793, 40796, 40797, 40798, 40799, 40861
- Diamond long mode: 40825, 40856, 40857
- Diamond compressed mode: 40841, 40854, 40855, 40856, [40858 - anomalous], 40864, 40865, 40868, 40869
References:
Production-is runs ?
These runs are maybe OK. Let's see...
- Diamond: 40881, 40883, 40893, 40894, 40895, 40896, 40898, 40902 [note 40892 looks bad?]
- AMO: 40884, 40885,
- Empty target: 40903
