Difference between revisions of "Sep 15, 2008 Calorimetry"
From GlueXWiki
(→Post Discussion) |
(→Post Discussion) |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
# Final agenda for collaboration meeting | # Final agenda for collaboration meeting | ||
| − | = Post Discussion = | + | = Post Discussion on SiPMs = |
# SiPM: A35H vs A20H devices | # SiPM: A35H vs A20H devices | ||
| + | # Delivered types | ||
#* 1x1 A20H contract units were Getter 2 | #* 1x1 A20H contract units were Getter 2 | ||
#* 3x3 A20H contract units were Getter 1 | #* 3x3 A20H contract units were Getter 1 | ||
#* 1x1 A35H contract units were Getter 2 | #* 1x1 A35H contract units were Getter 2 | ||
#* 3x3 A35H contract units were Getter 2 | #* 3x3 A35H contract units were Getter 2 | ||
| − | #* 3x3 A35H engineering (JLab only) units were Getter 1 | + | #* 3x3 A35H engineering (JLab only) units were Getter 1 |
| + | # Options for arrays: | ||
| + | #* 3x3 A20H Getter 1 or Getter 2 | ||
| + | #* 3x3 A35H Getter 1 only | ||
=Minutes= | =Minutes= | ||
Attending: | Attending: | ||
Revision as of 08:48, 15 September 2008
Usual Time: 10:30 ET.
- Phone:
- +1-800-377-8846 : US
- +1-888-276-7715 : Canada
- +1-302-709-8424 : International
- then enter participant code: 39527048# (remember the "#")
Contents
Items for followup from Sep 2 calibration meeting
- Each subsystem must complete blanks in specification table.
Items for followup from Aug 18 meeting
- George: report on trip to Edmonton
- Estimates of pedestal width (electronic noise, etc.) for FM PMTs. The dark rate should be negligigle in this case.
- Resolution studies with up-to-date geometry (Blake) ONGOING
- Resolution studies with different segmentation for the outer section. - LOWER PRIORITY
- Add F100 rad hard glass to simulation. - Matt will do this
- Decision on Bcal sampling fraction needed by Sep. - Work by Stamatis (on vacation) will be summarized upon his return.
Documents to Review
Tentative Agenda
- Announcements
- Results on study of increased sampling in BCAL
- Status of simulation tasks and discussion of priorities
- Improved simulation of resolutions
- Include realistic threshold for FM option
- Studies of timing resolution
- Study impact of inactive material at the end of Bcal on acceptance
- Inactive material includes light guides, light detector, cables, dark box or cover, etc.
- Comparison between SiPM and FM options
- How many (which) changes in geometry should be studied?
- Improved simulation of resolutions
- Final agenda for collaboration meeting
Post Discussion on SiPMs
- SiPM: A35H vs A20H devices
- Delivered types
- 1x1 A20H contract units were Getter 2
- 3x3 A20H contract units were Getter 1
- 1x1 A35H contract units were Getter 2
- 3x3 A35H contract units were Getter 2
- 3x3 A35H engineering (JLab only) units were Getter 1
- Options for arrays:
- 3x3 A20H Getter 1 or Getter 2
- 3x3 A35H Getter 1 only
Minutes
Attending:
