Difference between revisions of "SoftwareReview October 25"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Overview Talk by Curtis)
Line 42: Line 42:
  
 
== Afternoon Session (90 minutes) ==
 
== Afternoon Session (90 minutes) ==
 +
 +
=== Analysis ===
 +
* [1] Overview (phrase as response to previous report requesting end user experience)
 +
* [2] Introduce software workshop as an example of a "complete" physics analysis
 +
* [3-4] Event generator frameworks
 +
** AmpTools
 +
** bggen
 +
* [5-7] Analysis Framework
 +
** DANA and reconstructed objects
 +
** Reaction setup example
 +
** Kinematic fitting
 +
* [8-9] "mini-DST" ROOT tree output
 +
** Format of "PART" ROOT trees
 +
** Simple analysis example with a TSelector
 +
* [10-12] Multivariate Analysis
 +
** Introduction
 +
** BDT description
 +
** BDT performance
 +
* [13-17] Amplitude analysis
 +
** Introduction
 +
** sample fit for n3pi
 +
** n3pi fit results
 +
* [18] Summary

Revision as of 14:43, 22 October 2013

Software Review Planning Meeting Friday October 25, 2013.

2013 Software Review Page

Connecting

Phone:

  • +1-866-740-1260 : US+Canada
  • +1-303-248-0285 : International
  • then enter participant code: 3421244# (remember the "#").
  • or www.readytalk.com (and code without the #)

Outlines of Talks

We agreed that we would post a list of slides for the talks at the 12-Gev Software Review, but that we would most likely not have a meeting this week.

Morning Session (30 minutes)

Overview Talk by Curtis

  • [1-2] Title + Outline
  • [3-5] GlueX Physics an Amplitude Analysis
  • [6-12] Walk through major accomplishments. This includes
    • (i) Defined Data Formats: EVIO, REST, PART (root) data format.
    • (ii) December 2012 data challenge producing about 70% of the data we expect in 2016 with 10**7 running. What did we learn?
    • iii) Job management/ Work flow exercises.
    • (iv) Implementation of CCDB into analysis framework.
    • (v) development of analysis framework to initially facilitate the PID upgrade work, and ultimately develop the proposal in June.
    • (vi) High-level analysis tools: kinematic fitting, multivariate analysis, ....
    • (vii) July 2013 Software Workshop.
    • (viii) Code and algorithm improvements: Particle Identification, BCAL simulation and reconstruction, new tracking for spiraling tracks.
    • (ix) Start work on Level-III trigger and algorithms
    • (x) Online Data Challenge with level-III trigger.
    • (xi) Conversion to GEANT4.
  • [13] GlueX Running { Phase I,II,III,IV, ...
  • [14-17] Timeline to Physics with tasks
    • (i) Data Challenges
    • (ii) Calibration and Commissioning
    • (iii) Physics Analysis Planning
    • (iv) Level-III Trigger Development
    • (v) Testing of Work flow Developments.
  • [18] Manpower and Resources
  • [19-20] Summary/Conclusions

Afternoon Session (90 minutes)

Analysis

  • [1] Overview (phrase as response to previous report requesting end user experience)
  • [2] Introduce software workshop as an example of a "complete" physics analysis
  • [3-4] Event generator frameworks
    • AmpTools
    • bggen
  • [5-7] Analysis Framework
    • DANA and reconstructed objects
    • Reaction setup example
    • Kinematic fitting
  • [8-9] "mini-DST" ROOT tree output
    • Format of "PART" ROOT trees
    • Simple analysis example with a TSelector
  • [10-12] Multivariate Analysis
    • Introduction
    • BDT description
    • BDT performance
  • [13-17] Amplitude analysis
    • Introduction
    • sample fit for n3pi
    • n3pi fit results
  • [18] Summary