Difference between revisions of "Spring 2017 High Intensity Run Plan"
From GlueXWiki
(→Run Plan) |
(→Run Conditions) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Run Conditions == | == Run Conditions == | ||
− | + | * Radiator: JD70-100 (58 μm - 4.8·10<sup>-4</sup> R.L., 7×7 mm²) | |
− | ** | + | * CW beam current up to 500 nA |
− | * CDC? | + | * Tagger quadrupole on (-4.2 A). |
− | * FDC and TOF are fine with nominal settings | + | * 5.0 mm collimator hole |
+ | * Detector Settings | ||
+ | ** CDC? | ||
+ | ** FDC and TOF are fine with nominal settings | ||
+ | ** Lower TAGH counters remain off | ||
+ | * Trigger settings | ||
+ | ** Standard triggers | ||
+ | *** Include BCAL+FCAL+ST? | ||
+ | ** Prescale factor: 3? | ||
== Run Plan == | == Run Plan == |
Revision as of 16:18, 6 March 2017
This is the plan for running high intensity tests for the Spring 2017 run
Run Conditions
- Radiator: JD70-100 (58 μm - 4.8·10-4 R.L., 7×7 mm²)
- CW beam current up to 500 nA
- Tagger quadrupole on (-4.2 A).
- 5.0 mm collimator hole
- Detector Settings
- CDC?
- FDC and TOF are fine with nominal settings
- Lower TAGH counters remain off
- Trigger settings
- Standard triggers
- Include BCAL+FCAL+ST?
- Prescale factor: 3?
- Standard triggers
Run Plan
- 2 current points: 300 nA and 500 nA
- present data at 150 nA used as reference
- 2? runs: 1 PARA, 1 PERP
Analysis Plan
- Study rho, omega rate
- Statistical precision of asymmetry
- Estimate fraction of accidentals?