Difference between revisions of "Spring 2017 High Intensity Run Plan"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Analysis Plan)
(Run Conditions)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Run Conditions ==
 
== Run Conditions ==
  
* Radiator: JD70-100 (58 μm - 4.8&middot;10<sup>-4</sup> R.L., 7&times;7 mm&sup2;)
+
* Radiator: JD70-100 (58 μm - 4.8&middot;10<sup>-4</sup> R.L., 7&times;7 mm&sup2;) and/or 3x10^-4 Al radiator
 
* CW beam current up to 500 nA
 
* CW beam current up to 500 nA
 
* Tagger quadrupole on (-4.2 A).  
 
* Tagger quadrupole on (-4.2 A).  
 
* 5.0 mm collimator hole
 
* 5.0 mm collimator hole
 
* Detector Settings
 
* Detector Settings
** CDC?
+
** CDC: 2125V HV, with following trip settings:
 +
*** 24 uA for 300 nA beam
 +
*** 36 uA for 500 nA beam
 
** FDC and TOF are fine with nominal settings
 
** FDC and TOF are fine with nominal settings
 
** Lower TAGH counters remain off
 
** Lower TAGH counters remain off

Revision as of 18:54, 6 March 2017

This is the plan for running high intensity tests for the Spring 2017 run

Run Conditions

  • Radiator: JD70-100 (58 μm - 4.8·10-4 R.L., 7×7 mm²) and/or 3x10^-4 Al radiator
  • CW beam current up to 500 nA
  • Tagger quadrupole on (-4.2 A).
  • 5.0 mm collimator hole
  • Detector Settings
    • CDC: 2125V HV, with following trip settings:
      • 24 uA for 300 nA beam
      • 36 uA for 500 nA beam
    • FDC and TOF are fine with nominal settings
    • Lower TAGH counters remain off
  • Trigger settings
    • Standard triggers
      • Include BCAL+FCAL+ST?
    • Prescale factor: 3?

Run Plan

  • 2 current points: 300 nA and 500 nA
    • present data at 150 nA used as reference
  • 2? runs: 1 PARA, 1 PERP

Analysis Plan

  • Study rho, omega rate
  • Statistical precision of asymmetry
    • 1 run will give rho asymmetry on level of 40 +- 1 %
    • omega statistics are factor of ~10 less
  • Estimate fraction of accidentals?