Difference between revisions of "Statement of Work for the 100% engineering drawings"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 32: Line 32:
 
'''Stage 1 – evaluation of conceptual design drawings'''
 
'''Stage 1 – evaluation of conceptual design drawings'''
  
This assessment includes a list of design drawings, which are part of the conceptual design. Full compliance with the specifications described in reference [1] and the results of the review of this stage are mandatory for further progress.  
+
This assessment includes a list of design drawings, which are part of the conceptual design. Full compliance with the specifications described in reference [1] and the results of the review of this stage are mandatory for further progress. The drawings have to show how internal key alignment parameters are transferred to external coordinates that are to be used for surveying the setup.  
  
 
1. Top level drawings of complete system including quadrupole, two dipole magnets, vacuum system and strong-back support.
 
1. Top level drawings of complete system including quadrupole, two dipole magnets, vacuum system and strong-back support.
Line 69: Line 69:
 
'''Stage 4 – engineering design of the quadrupole and strongback support'''
 
'''Stage 4 – engineering design of the quadrupole and strongback support'''
  
The complete engineering design of the quadrupole and strongback support structure shall be performed. The engineering design include as well the table support for the quadrupole. The strong back support has to be extended in order to hold the support structure of the fixed-array hodoscope.
+
The complete engineering design of the quadrupole and strongback support structure shall be performed. The engineering design include as well the table support for the quadrupole. The strong back support has to be extended in order to hold the support structure of the fixed-array hodoscope, a stress analysis has to be performed to confirm that the designed strongback allows to hold the magnets and vacuum chamber.
 +
 
  
 
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
[1] Hall_D_Tagger_Spec_v4.doc (gluex document 821) [[GlueX_tagger_specification]]
 
[1] Hall_D_Tagger_Spec_v4.doc (gluex document 821) [[GlueX_tagger_specification]]

Revision as of 12:37, 20 October 2007

Statement-of-Work for the engineering design of the Hall-D Tagging Magnets and Vacuum Chamber system

Draft v.1 (9/24/07)


This statement-of-work is to develop detailed engineering drawings and all required material calculations for the Hall-D Tagging Magnets and Vacuum Chamber system based on the design goals stated in version 4 of 5/7/07 of the document titled “Hall D Tagged Photon Spectrometer: Technical Description and Specification” [1] and the conceptual design drawings provided by Jefferson Lab, University of Glasgow [2], and Institute for High Energy Physics in Moscow [3]. The scope of this statement-of-work will be detailed in the following section. The separation of engineering design and fabrication is required according to the procurement rules of the U.S. Department of Energy. The contractor for this statement-of-work is allowed to bid for the contract to manufacture the system.

The Hall-D Tagging Magnets and Vacuum Chamber system includes the following parts:

a) Two dipole magnets including coils and cooling system

b) Vacuum box including flanges for thin windows and external supporting structures

c) Quadrupole magnet including coils and table support

d) Strongback support structure for the dipoles and the fixed-array hodoscope. The design of the hodoscope is not part of this contract.


The engineering design includes detailed drawings of all parts of the system such that these design drawings can directly be used to manufacture the parts. A finite elements analysis has to be performed for all parts that are subjected to strong magnetic forces and/or connected to the vacuum box. The goal is in particular an optimization of the number and position of fasteners (bolts and brackets) holding the magnet yokes and pole shoes and vacuum box in place as well as the rib structure for stiffening the vacuum box. The design drawings for dipole magnets shall include two versions: (i) upper and lower magnet yokes made out of one single piece each, (ii) upper and lower magnet yokes assembled out of steel plates.


The drawing model has to be provided in 3-dimensional form, layout and detail drawings can be performed in 2-dimensional form using a professional CAD program. Jefferson Lab will provide a numbering scheme in order to include the drawings into their database. Further details concerning interfacing with Jefferson Lab’s designing scheme will be provided.


The magnetic field calculations of the quadrupole and two-dipole magnet system performed at the University of Glasgow shall be used to calculate the forces and to define machining and fabrication tolerances for the magnets and support structure. If additional calculations are needed, these should be requested along with the revised list of drawings that need to be produced.


This statement-of-work requires deliverables in 4 stages. Detailed discussions between designers and Jefferson Lab personnel / Hall-D collaborators are required at every stage, including monthly phone conferences and quarterly reviews of the design process. The transfer of funds for the ongoing design will be bound to the successful completion of each design stage.

Stage 1 – evaluation of conceptual design drawings

This assessment includes a list of design drawings, which are part of the conceptual design. Full compliance with the specifications described in reference [1] and the results of the review of this stage are mandatory for further progress. The drawings have to show how internal key alignment parameters are transferred to external coordinates that are to be used for surveying the setup.

1. Top level drawings of complete system including quadrupole, two dipole magnets, vacuum system and strong-back support.

2. Vertical section through a dipole showing how the pole shoes and yoke parts fit together.

3. Top view of a dipole showing the numbers, sizes and locations of the bolts required to hold the structure together.

4. Individual drawings for the pole shoes, top and bottom yokes and back yoke, showing details of bolt locations, flatness of surfaces and tolerances - including the vacuum sealing lips round the pole shoes, and pole profiles.

5. Individual drawings of the pole shoes showing where the fixing holes for taking the vacuum tensioning brackets and the coil support brackets are located.

6. Drawings showing the different types of brackets as required by further refinement of design. For example, the brackets which hold the dipole coils in position should extend over the top of the upper coils.

7. Layout of vacuum chamber showing how top and bottom lids, back wall and output flange are welded together. The input port, the photon beam pipe, and main electron beam output ports shall also be shown.

8. Individual drawings of the top and bottom lids, and the back-wall of the vacuum chamber showing where the fixing holes for taking the vacuum tensioning brackets are located.

9. Top and side view drawings for the quadrupole magnet and its table support.

10. Top and side view drawings for the strong back support for the dipole magnets and fixed-array hodoscope.

11. Drawings showing assembly and disassembly of magnet, including features which allow this sequence of activities. For example, tapped holes for attaching jacking supports to the dipole yokes for use in the assembly and disassembly of the dipoles have to be added.

Stage 2 – engineering design of the dipole magnet

The complete engineering design of the dipole magnet shall be performed including FEA of the energized magnet. Special care has to be taken for the pole shoe design and the attachment of the vacuum box. The design drawings for the dipole magnets shall include two versions: (i) upper and lower magnet yokes made out of one single piece each, (ii) upper and lower magnet yokes assembled out of steel plates.

Stage 3 – engineering design of the vacuum chamber

The complete engineering design of the vacuum box shall be performed including a finite element analysis showing that the rib structure for stiffening the vacuum box is optimized. Special care should be taken for the exact position of electron beam entry port, position and direction of the photon beam pipe, and the position of the exit port for the deflected primary electron beam.

Stage 4 – engineering design of the quadrupole and strongback support

The complete engineering design of the quadrupole and strongback support structure shall be performed. The engineering design include as well the table support for the quadrupole. The strong back support has to be extended in order to hold the support structure of the fixed-array hodoscope, a stress analysis has to be performed to confirm that the designed strongback allows to hold the magnets and vacuum chamber.



[1] Hall_D_Tagger_Spec_v4.doc (gluex document 821) GlueX_tagger_specification

[2] AutoCAD drawing: Preliminary_drawing_by_Yang and presentations.

[3] IHEP AutoCAD drawings 35%_drawing_by_IHEP_provided_in_April/May_2007