Difference between revisions of "Tracking-2-23-2023"
From GlueXWiki
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
#**Suggestions: | #**Suggestions: | ||
#**#Run monitoring histograms (CDC_Efficiency, CDC_dedx what else?) over bggen | #**#Run monitoring histograms (CDC_Efficiency, CDC_dedx what else?) over bggen | ||
| − | #**#Are the random triggers enough to simulate the extra DC hits (from photons) in 2017 before the W foil was added? We might be able to identify these from integral/amplitude. | + | #**#Are the random triggers enough to simulate the extra DC hits (from photons) in 2017 before the W foil was added? We might be able to identify these from integral/amplitude. |
| + | #**#For the higher intensity runs we might be able to use the quality codes from the timing algo, it identifies pulses w too high pedestal. | ||
# AOB | # AOB | ||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
Revision as of 10:52, 22 February 2023
Thu 2/23/2023 2pm
Agenda
- Detector status:
- CDC
- FDC
- GEM-TRD
- Tracking
- Differences between run periods
- Ratios of
for 
production for the different beam times and batches. Ratios are always taken with respect to full 2018-08 data.File:L1520 cs ratios.pdf - Same ratios vs beam current * radiator thickness
- Alex's rho CM update
- Suggestions:
- Run monitoring histograms (CDC_Efficiency, CDC_dedx what else?) over bggen
- Are the random triggers enough to simulate the extra DC hits (from photons) in 2017 before the W foil was added? We might be able to identify these from integral/amplitude.
- For the higher intensity runs we might be able to use the quality codes from the timing algo, it identifies pulses w too high pedestal.
- Ratios of
- Differences between run periods
- AOB
